{
    "case_number": "CAC-UDRP-103332",
    "time_of_filling": "2020-10-06 11:52:23",
    "domain_names": [
        "achem-block.com"
    ],
    "case_administrator": "  Iveta Špiclová   (Czech Arbitration Court) (Case admin)",
    "complainant": [
        "Advanced ChemBlocks Inc"
    ],
    "complainant_representative": "Dr. Daniel Dimov (Dimov Internet Law Consulting)",
    "respondent": [
        "liangliang wang"
    ],
    "respondent_representative": null,
    "factual_background": "FACTS ASSERTED BY THE COMPLAINANT AND NOT CONTESTED BY THE RESPONDENT:\r\n\r\nThe Complainant is a worldwide supplier of advanced building blocks and research chemicals for drug discovery. The Complainant has been active in the pharmaceutical industry since 2009. The Complainant is active in the United States, Canada, Europe, Japan, India, South Korea, and China, among other countries.\r\n \r\nThe Complainant uses the trademark <achemblock> in the course of trade since 2009 and has registered the domain name <achemblock.com> in 2009. \r\n\r\nThe disputed domain name was registered on April 28, 2019 and it currently hosts a website active in the supply of chemical materials.   ",
    "other_legal_proceedings": "The Panel is not aware of pending or decided legal proceedings related to the disputed domain name.",
    "no_response_filed": "PARTIES' CONTENTIONS:\r\n\r\nCOMPLAINANT:\r\n\r\nAs regards the First element of the Policy, the Complainant claims that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to its prior trademark \"ACHEMBLOK\". The addition of the \"-\" between the elements \"ACHEM\" and \"BLOCK\" does not exclude the finding of confusing similarity for the purposes of the Policy.\r\n\r\nAs regards the Second element of the Policy, the Complainant denies that the Respondent has rights or legitimate interests in registering the disputed domain name. According to the Complainant the disputed domain name is not used in connection with a bona fide offering of goods or services as the disputed domain name is allegedly used to attract Internet users for commercial gain by creating a likelihood of confusion with the Complainant’s Trademark. \r\n\r\nAs regards the Third element of the Policy, supports that the disputed domain name is used in bad faith because the purpose of the registration was to attract Internet users for commercial gain by creating a likelihood of confusion with the Complainant’s Trademark. \r\n\r\n\r\nRESPONDENT:\r\n\r\nNo administrative response has been submitted.",
    "rights": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy).  ",
    "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy).  ",
    "bad_faith": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy).  ",
    "procedural_factors": "The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.",
    "decision": "Accepted",
    "panelists": [
        "Andrea Mascetti"
    ],
    "date_of_panel_decision": "2020-11-15 00:00:00",
    "informal_english_translation": "The Complainant claims to have acquired unregistered trademark rights on \"ACHEMBLOCK\" through use in United States.\r\n\r\nThe Complainant contends to be the owner of the domain name <achemblock.com>. \r\n\r\n",
    "decision_domains": {
        "ACHEM-BLOCK.COM": "TRANSFERRED"
    },
    "panelist": null,
    "panellists_text": null
}