{
    "case_number": "CAC-UDRP-103353",
    "time_of_filling": "2020-10-16 09:24:45",
    "domain_names": [
        "simonesoldes.com"
    ],
    "case_administrator": "Denisa Bilík (CAC) (Case admin)",
    "complainant": [
        "SIMONE PERELE"
    ],
    "complainant_representative": "Nameshield (Laurent Becker)",
    "respondent": [
        "liling weng"
    ],
    "respondent_representative": null,
    "factual_background": "FACTS ASSERTED BY THE COMPLAINANT AND NOT CONTESTED BY THE RESPONDENT:\r\n\r\nSee similar case CAC n° 102223 MAJE v. Charles Lamontagne (“the disputed domain name points to website where clothing and accessories are offered for sale. The Complainant figurative trademark MAJE is used on the Registrant's website and in its title “MAJE | Vêtements et accessoires” uses also the French languages to increase the imitation […] the Respondent used on its website pictures directly taken from the Complainant’s official website and this increases the likelihood that Internet users would be confused into believing Respondent's website emanated from or was sponsored or authorized […]the Respondent has registered and is using the disputed domain name in bad faith.”).",
    "other_legal_proceedings": "None of which the Panel is aware of.",
    "no_response_filed": "NO ADMINISTRATIVELY COMPLIANT RESPONSE HAS BEEN FILED.",
    "rights": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy).",
    "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "The Complainant has not, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy).",
    "bad_faith": "Because the three conditions are cumulative, the negative answer to the second condition makes it unnecessary to assess the third one.",
    "procedural_factors": "The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.",
    "decision": "Rejected",
    "panelists": [
        "Mr. Etienne Wéry"
    ],
    "date_of_panel_decision": "2020-11-26 00:00:00",
    "informal_english_translation": "The Complainant is the owner of several trademarks “SIMONE PERELE”, such as:\r\n- International trademark SIMONE PERELE® n° 272755, registered on August 9, 1963 for the class 25;\r\n- European trademark SIMONE PERELE® n° 4367512, registered on March 30, 2005 for the class 25;\r\n- European trademark SP SIMONE PERELE PARIS® n°13026216 registered on June 24, 2014; and\r\n- European trademark SIMONE & SIMONE PERELE® n° 18269546, registered on July 8, 2020 for the classes 24, 25 and 26.\r\n",
    "decision_domains": {
        "SIMONESOLDES.COM": "REJECTED"
    },
    "panelist": null,
    "panellists_text": null
}