{
    "case_number": "CAC-UDRP-103390",
    "time_of_filling": "2020-11-12 11:02:32",
    "domain_names": [
        "GRUPPO-ISP-INTESA.COM"
    ],
    "case_administrator": "  Iveta Špiclová   (Czech Arbitration Court) (Case admin)",
    "complainant": [
        "intesa Sanpaolo S.p.A."
    ],
    "complainant_representative": "Intesa Sanpaolo S.p.A.",
    "respondent": [
        "Mark  Etplace"
    ],
    "respondent_representative": null,
    "factual_background": "FACTS ASSERTED BY THE COMPLAINANT AND NOT CONTESTED BY THE RESPONDENT:\r\n\r\nThe Complainant claims to be among the top banking groups in the euro zone, with a market capitalisation exceeding 46,4 billion euro, and the undisputed leader in Italy, in all business areas (retail, corporate and wealth management).\r\n\r\nIt further contends its mark “GRUPPO INTESA” and “GRUPPO INTESA SANPAOLO” to be distinctive and well-known worldwide.\r\n\r\nThe Respondent registered the disputed domain name on March 18, 2020. The disputed domain name resolves to a website sponsoring, among others, banking and financial services.\r\n\r\nOn April 3, 2020 the Complainant’s attorneys sent a cease and desist letter to the Respondent, asking for the voluntary transfer of the disputed domain name to the Complainant. The Respondent did not reply to this letter.",
    "other_legal_proceedings": "The Panel is not aware of any other legal proceedings which are pending or decided and which relate to the disputed domain name.",
    "no_response_filed": "NO ADMINISTRATIVELY COMPLIANT RESPONSE HAS BEEN FILED.",
    "rights": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy).",
    "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy).",
    "bad_faith": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy).",
    "procedural_factors": "The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.",
    "decision": "Accepted",
    "panelists": [
        "Dr. Tobias Malte Müller"
    ],
    "date_of_panel_decision": "2020-12-21 00:00:00",
    "informal_english_translation": "The Complainant is the registered owner of several trademark registrations consisting of the terms  “ISP”, “GRUPPO INTESA” and “GRUPPO INTESA SANPAOLO”:\r\n\r\n- EU trademark registration no. 7310337 “ISP”, filed on October 13, 2008 and granted on February 12, 2010 and duly renewed, in connection with class 36;\r\n\r\n- EU trademark registration no. 779827 “GRUPPO INTESA”, filed on March 24, 1998 and granted on November 15, 1999 and duly renewed, in connection with classes 9, 16, 36, 41 and 42;\r\n\r\n- EU trademark registration no. 5344544 “GRUPPO INTESA SANPAOLO”, filed on September 28, 2006, granted on July 6, 2007 and duly renewed, in connection with classes 35, 36 and 38.\r\n",
    "decision_domains": {
        "GRUPPO-ISP-INTESA.COM": "TRANSFERRED"
    },
    "panelist": null,
    "panellists_text": null
}