{
    "case_number": "CAC-UDRP-103476",
    "time_of_filling": "2020-12-23 11:49:21",
    "domain_names": [
        "GRUPPOINTESA-ID.COM"
    ],
    "case_administrator": "  Iveta Špiclová   (Czech Arbitration Court) (Case admin)",
    "complainant": [
        "Intesa Sanpaolo S.p.A."
    ],
    "complainant_representative": "Intesa Sanpaolo S.p.A.",
    "respondent": [
        "Sara Fortunas"
    ],
    "respondent_representative": null,
    "factual_background": "The Complainant, Intesa Sanpaolo S.p.A., is an Italian banking group resulting from the merger (effective as of January 1, 2007) between Banca Intesa S.p.A. and Sanpaolo IMI S.p.A. The Complainant has a market capitalisation exceeding 37,4 billion euro and a network of approximately 5,360 branches in Italy. The Complainant also has a strong presence in Central-Eastern Europe with a network of approximately 1.100 branches and over 7,2 million customers. Moreover, the Complainant’s international network specialised in supporting corporate customers is present in 26 countries, in particular in the Mediterranean area and those areas where Italian companies are most active, such as the United States, Russia, China and India.\r\n\r\nThe Complainant is the owner of the word marks INTESA and GRUPPO INTESA, registered in several classes and covering various countries, including in Italia where the Respondent is located. The Complainant also claims to be the owner of various domain names including <gruppointesa.com>, which redirects to the Complainant’s official website http:\/\/www.intesasanpaolo.com\/.\r\n\r\nThe disputed domain name <gruppointesa-id.com> has been registered on April 17, 2020 by the Respondent. According to evidence provided by the Complainant, the disputed domain name does not refer to any active website. ",
    "other_legal_proceedings": "The Panel is not aware of any other legal proceedings which are pending or decided and which relate to the disputed domain name.",
    "no_response_filed": "NO ADMINISTRATIVELY COMPLIANT RESPONSE HAS BEEN FILED.\r\n\r\nPARTIES' CONTENTIONS:\r\n\r\nCOMPLAINANT:\r\n\r\nThe Complainant considers the disputed domain name to be confusingly similar to trademarks in which it has rights. The Complainant claims that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name. According to the Complainant, the Respondent does not use the disputed domain name in connection with any legitimate use. Also, according to the Complainant, the Respondent has not been authorized to register or use the disputed domain name. Finally, the Complainant considers that the disputed domain name was registered and is being used in bad faith. The Complainant contends that the Respondent knew, or at least should have known, of the existence of the Complainant’s trademarks. According to the Complainant, there are present circumstances indicating that the Respondent has registered or acquired the disputed domain name primarily for the purpose of selling, renting, or otherwise transferring the disputed domain name registration to the Complainant who is the owner of the trademark or service mark or to a competitor of Complainant, for valuable consideration in excess of the Respondent’s documented out-of-pocket costs directly related to the disputed domain name. The Complainant further contends that there is no conceivable legitimate use that could be made of the disputed domain name by the Respondent.\r\n\r\n\r\nRESPONDENT:\r\n\r\nThe Respondent did not reply to the Complainant’s contentions.",
    "rights": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy).",
    "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy).",
    "bad_faith": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy).",
    "procedural_factors": "The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.",
    "decision": "Accepted",
    "panelists": [
        "Flip Petillion"
    ],
    "date_of_panel_decision": "2021-01-27 00:00:00",
    "informal_english_translation": "The Complainant is the holder of various trademarks including the following:\r\n\r\n- INTESA, International trademark registration No. 793367, registered on September 4, 2002 in class 36; \r\n\r\n- INTESA, EU trademark registration No. 12247979, registered on March 5, 2014 in classes 9, 16, 35, 36, 38, 41 and 42;\r\n\r\n- GRUPPO INTESA, EU trademark registration No. 000779827, registered on November 15, 1999 in classes 9, 16, 36, 38, 41 and 42.",
    "decision_domains": {
        "GRUPPOINTESA-ID.COM": "TRANSFERRED"
    },
    "panelist": null,
    "panellists_text": null
}