{
    "case_number": "CAC-UDRP-103478",
    "time_of_filling": "2020-12-29 00:00:00",
    "domain_names": [
        "leasaffre.com"
    ],
    "case_administrator": "  Iveta Špiclová   (Czech Arbitration Court) (Case admin)",
    "complainant": [
        "LESAFFRE ET COMPAGNIE"
    ],
    "complainant_representative": "Nameshield (Laurent Becker)",
    "respondent": [
        "Fizzle Technology"
    ],
    "respondent_representative": null,
    "factual_background": "FACTS ASSERTED BY THE COMPLAINANT AND NOT CONTESTED BY THE RESPONDENT:\r\n\r\nThis is a clear case of \"typosquatting“, i.e. the disputed domain name obviously contains a misspelling of the Complainant’s trademark: LEASAFFRE instead of LESAFFRE®.  The Complainant refers to previous panel decisions, for instance: \r\n\r\n- Forum case no. FA 877979, Microsoft Corp. v. Domain Registration Philippines (finding bad faith registration and use of the <microssoft.com> domain name as it merely misspelled the complainant’s MICROSOFT mark);\r\n\r\n- Forum case no. FA 157321, Computerized Sec. Sys., Inc. v. Hu (finding that the respondent engaged in typosquatting, which is evidence of bad faith registration and use under Policy 4(a)(iii)).\r\n",
    "other_legal_proceedings": "The Panel is not aware of any other legal proceedings which are pending or decided and which relate to the disputed domain name.",
    "no_response_filed": "NO ADMINISTRATIVELY COMPLIANT RESPONSE HAS BEEN FILED.",
    "rights": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy).",
    "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy).",
    "bad_faith": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy).",
    "procedural_factors": "The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.",
    "decision": "Accepted",
    "panelists": [
        "Stephanie G. Hartung, LL.M."
    ],
    "date_of_panel_decision": "2021-02-03 00:00:00",
    "informal_english_translation": "The Complainant has evidenced to be the registered owner of several trademarks relating to its company name and brand “Lesaffre”, inter alia, the following:\r\n\r\n- Word-\/device mark LESAFFRE, French Intellectual Property Organisation, Registration No.: 3202372, Registration Date: January 2, 2003, Status: active;\r\n\r\n- Word-\/device mark LESAFFRE GROUP, World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), Registration No.: 826663, Registration Date: February 4, 2004, Status: active, with protection for numerous countries worldwide.\r\n",
    "decision_domains": {
        "LEASAFFRE.COM": "TRANSFERRED"
    },
    "panelist": null,
    "panellists_text": null
}