{
    "case_number": "CAC-UDRP-103573",
    "time_of_filling": "2021-02-12 09:32:32",
    "domain_names": [
        "extsocgen.com ",
        "sgsssocgen.com"
    ],
    "case_administrator": "  Iveta Špiclová   (Czech Arbitration Court) (Case admin)",
    "complainant": [
        "SOCIETE GENERALE"
    ],
    "complainant_representative": "Nameshield (Laurent Becker)",
    "respondent": [
        "Bob Coleman"
    ],
    "respondent_representative": null,
    "factual_background": "FACTS ASSERTED BY THE COMPLAINANT AND NOT CONTESTED BY THE RESPONDENT:\r\n\r\nThe term “SOCGEN” is a contraction of “SOCiete GENerale”. There is no meaning in English or any languages. The disputed domain names are confusingly similar to the Complainant's well-known trademark SOCGEN®. See WIPO Case n° D2002-0457 Societe Generale v. DLI, Dale Miller (“the Panel accepts the evidence of the Complainant that it is a well known bank and that the trade mark \"SOCGEN\" is used in France and all over the world to designate the Complainant especially in the international press.”).\r\n\r\n\r\nRegarding the use of disputed domain names:\r\n\r\n - <extsocgen.com>: The disputed domain name is inactive since its registration. As prior panels have held, the incorporation of a famous mark into a domain name, coupled with an inactive website, is evidence of bad faith registration and use. (See Telstra Corporation Limited v Nuclear Marshmallows D2000-0003 WIPO Feb 18 2000);\r\n\r\n- <sgsssocgen.com>: The disputed domain name redirects to a commercial links in relation with the Complainant (See “Dr. Martens International Trading GmbH, Dr. Maertens Marketing GmbH v. Private Whois Service, WIPO Case No. D2011-1753. A respondent cannot disclaim responsibility for programmatically generated PPC content. See WIPO Overview 3.0 at section 3.5.”).  \r\n",
    "other_legal_proceedings": "The Panel is not aware of any other legal proceedings which are pending or decided and which relate to the disputed domain names.",
    "no_response_filed": "NO ADMINISTRATIVELY COMPLIANT RESPONSE HAS BEEN FILED.",
    "rights": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain names are identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy).  ",
    "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain names (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy).  ",
    "bad_faith": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain names have been registered and are being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy).  ",
    "procedural_factors": "The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.",
    "decision": "Accepted",
    "panelists": [
        "Stephanie G. Hartung, LL.M."
    ],
    "date_of_panel_decision": "2021-03-18 00:00:00",
    "informal_english_translation": "The Complainant has evidenced to be the registered owner of several trademarks relating to its abbreviated company name and brand “SOCGEN”, inter alia, the following:\r\n\r\n- Word mark SOCGEN, International trademark, Registration No.: 772893, Registration Date: December 5, 2001, Status: active;\r\n\r\n- Word mark SOCGEN, European Union Intellectual Property Organization (EUIPO), Registration No.: 000476671, Registration Date: December 17, 1998, Status: active.\r\n",
    "decision_domains": {
        "EXTSOCGEN.COM ": "TRANSFERRED",
        "SGSSSOCGEN.COM": "TRANSFERRED"
    },
    "panelist": null,
    "panellists_text": null
}