{
    "case_number": "CAC-UDRP-103619",
    "time_of_filling": "2021-03-03 09:18:14",
    "domain_names": [
        "boehrlnger-ingellheim.com"
    ],
    "case_administrator": "  Iveta Špiclová   (Czech Arbitration Court) (Case admin)",
    "complainant": [
        "Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co.KG"
    ],
    "complainant_representative": "Nameshield (Enora Millocheau)",
    "respondent": [
        "Tywan  Lawson"
    ],
    "respondent_representative": null,
    "factual_background": "Complainant states that it “is a family-owned pharmaceutical group of companies with roots going back to 1885, when it was founded by Albert Boehringer (1861-1939) in Ingelheim am Rhein. Ever since, Boehringer has become a global research-driven pharmaceutical enterprise and has today about roughly 51,000 employees. The three main business areas of BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM are: human pharmaceuticals, animal health and biopharmaceuticals. In 2019, BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM achieved net sales of 19 billion euros.”\r\n\r\nThe Disputed Domain Name was created on February 24, 2021, resolves to an inactive website, and has been used in connection with what Complainant describes as a phishing scheme (as evidenced by an email sent from an address using the Disputed Domain Name apparently impersonating Complainant’s CFO and referencing “an essential payment to be executed under intercompany remittances”).\r\n\r\nParagraph 4(a)(i): Complainant states, inter alia, that the Disputed Domain Name is confusingly similar to the BOEHRINGER-INGELHEIM Trademark because it contains a misspelling of the BOEHRINGER-INGELHEIM Trademark, adding an additional letter “L” and substituting a letter “L” for a letter “I,” which is “a clear case of ‘typosquatting’” and  “does not change the overall impression of the designation as being connected to the trademark BOEHRINGER-INGELHEIM.”\r\n\r\nParagraph 4(a)(ii): Complainant states that Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the Disputed Domain Name because, inter alia, “Respondent is not known as the disputed domain name, but as ‘Tywan Lawson’”; “Complainant does not carry out any activity for, nor has any business with the Respondent”; “[n]either license nor authorization has been granted to the Respondent to make any use of the Complainant’s trademark BOEHRINGER-INGELHEIM®, or apply for registration of the disputed domain name by the Complainant”; and “Respondent uses the disputed domain name to pass itself off as one of the Complainant’s executive, in order to receive undue payment.”\r\n\r\nParagraph 4(a)(iii): Complainant states that the Disputed Domain Name was registered and is being used in bad faith because, inter alia, “[g]iven the distinctiveness of the Complainant's trademark and its reputation, it is reasonable to infer that the Respondent has registered and used the domain name with full knowledge of the Complainant's trademark”; “Respondent has used the domain name in a phishing scheme, attempting to pass off as one of the Complainant’s executive”; and “it is well-established that using a domain name for purposes of phishing or other fraudulent activity constitutes solid evidence of bad faith use.”\r\n",
    "other_legal_proceedings": "The Panel is not aware of any other legal proceedings that are pending or decided and that relate to the Disputed Domain Name.",
    "no_response_filed": "No administratively compliant response has been filed.",
    "rights": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy).  ",
    "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy).  ",
    "bad_faith": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy).  ",
    "procedural_factors": "The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.",
    "decision": "Accepted",
    "panelists": [
        "Douglas M. Isenberg"
    ],
    "date_of_panel_decision": "2021-04-06 00:00:00",
    "informal_english_translation": "Complainant states, and provides evidence to support, that it is the owner of “a large portfolio of trademarks including the wording ‘BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM’ in several countries, such as the international trademark BOEHRINGER-INGELHEIM® n°221544, registered since July 2, 1959 and duly renewed, and the international trademark BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM® n°568844 registered since March 22, 1991.” These marks are referred to hereafter as the “BOEHRINGER-INGELHEIM Trademark.”  ",
    "decision_domains": {
        "BOEHRLNGER-INGELLHEIM.COM": "TRANSFERRED"
    },
    "panelist": null,
    "panellists_text": null
}