{
    "case_number": "CAC-UDRP-103717",
    "time_of_filling": "2021-04-07 17:29:04",
    "domain_names": [
        "leetchicash.com"
    ],
    "case_administrator": "  Iveta Špiclová   (Czech Arbitration Court) (Case admin)",
    "complainant": [
        "LEETCHI"
    ],
    "complainant_representative": "Nameshield (Enora Millocheau)",
    "respondent": [
        "GNAME.COM PTE. LTD."
    ],
    "respondent_representative": null,
    "factual_background": "The Complainant, Leetchi, operates an online money pot website through the domain name <leetchi.com> and currently counts 12 million users. The Complainant proposes a fast, easy and secure way for people to raise money for group gifts, common expenses and causes.\r\n\r\nThe disputed domain name <leetchicash.com> has been registered on March 14, 2021 by the Respondent. The disputed domain name redirected to a login page for a lottery platform.  ",
    "other_legal_proceedings": "The Panel is not aware of any other legal proceedings which are pending or decided and which relate to the disputed domain name.",
    "no_response_filed": "NO ADMINISTRATIVELY COMPLIANT RESPONSE HAS BEEN FILED.\r\n\r\nPARTIES' CONTENTIONS:\r\n\r\nCOMPLAINANT:\r\n\r\nThe Complainant considers the disputed domain name to be confusingly similar to trademarks in which it has rights. The Complainant claims that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name. According to the Complainant, the Respondent does not use the disputed domain name in connection with any legitimate use. Also, according to the Complainant, the Respondent has not been authorized to register or use the disputed domain name. Finally, the Complainant considers that the disputed domain name was registered and is being used in bad faith. The Complainant contends that the Respondent knew, or at least should have known, of the existence of the Complainant’s trademarks. The Complainant further contends that the Respondent has intentionally attempted to attract, for commercial gain, Internet users to its website, by creating a likelihood of confusion with the Complainant’s mark.\r\n\r\n\r\nRESPONDENT:\r\n\r\nThe Respondent did not reply to the Complainant’s contentions.",
    "rights": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy).",
    "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy).",
    "bad_faith": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy).",
    "procedural_factors": "The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.",
    "decision": "Accepted",
    "panelists": [
        "Flip Petillion"
    ],
    "date_of_panel_decision": "2021-05-12 00:00:00",
    "informal_english_translation": "The Complainant is the holder of various trademarks including the following:\r\n\r\n- LEETCHI, EU word mark registration No. 015451891, registered on September 14, 2016 in classes 9, 35, 36, 38 and 42.  ",
    "decision_domains": {
        "LEETCHICASH.COM": "TRANSFERRED"
    },
    "panelist": null,
    "panellists_text": null
}