{
    "case_number": "CAC-UDRP-103819",
    "time_of_filling": "2021-05-24 09:33:51",
    "domain_names": [
        "LOGIN-INTESASANPAOLO.COM"
    ],
    "case_administrator": "  Iveta Špiclová   (Czech Arbitration Court) (Case admin)",
    "complainant": [
        "Intesa Sanpaolo S.p.A."
    ],
    "complainant_representative": "Intesa Sanpaolo S.p.A.",
    "respondent": [
        "Leone Toscano"
    ],
    "respondent_representative": null,
    "factual_background": "Complainant states that it is “the leading Italian banking group and also one of the protagonists in the European financial arena”; that it is “among the top banking groups in the euro zone, with a market capitalisation exceeding 45,1 billion euro, and the undisputed leader in Italy, in all business areas (retail, corporate and wealth management)”; that it has “a network of approximately 4,700 branches” serving “approximately 13,5 million customers… in 65 countries, in particular in the Mediterranean area and those areas where Italian companies are most active, such as the United States, Russia, China and India.”\r\n\r\nThe Disputed Domain Name was created on July 9, 2020, and, although it is not being used in connection with an active website, “Complainant believes that the current owner registered the disputed domain name with the ‘phishing’ purpose, in order to induce and divert the Complainant’s legitimate customers to its website and steal their money and the above could be easily verified given the particular nature of the disputed domain name (typosquatting).”\r\n\r\nComplainant contends, in relevant part, as follows:\r\n\r\nParagraph 4(a)(i): Complainant states that the Disputed Domain Name is confusingly similar to the INTESA SANPAOLO Trademark because it “exactly reproduces the well-known trademark ‘INTESA SANPAOLO’, with the mere addition of the descriptive term ‘LOGIN’.”\r\n\r\nParagraph 4(a)(ii): Complainant states that Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the Disputed Domain Name because, inter alia, “[n]obody has been authorized or licensed by the above-mentioned banking group to use the domain name at issue”; the Disputed Domain Name “does not correspond to the name of the Respondent and, to the best of our knowledge, the Respondent is not commonly known as ‘LOGIN-INTESASANPAOLO”; and “we do not find any fair or non-commercial uses of the domain name at stake.”\r\n\r\nParagraph 4(a)(iii): Complainant states that the Disputed Domain Name was registered and is being used in bad faith because, inter alia, the INTESA SANPAOLO Trademark “distinctive and well known all around the world”; “[t]he fact that the Respondent has registered a domain name that is confusingly similar to [it] indicates that the Respondent had knowledge of the Complainant’s trademark at the time of registration of the disputed domain name”; although the Disputed Domain Name “is not connected to any web site,… countless UDRP decisions confirmed that the passive holding of a domain name with knowledge that the domain name infringes another party’s trademark rights is evidence of bad faith registration and use”; and “[t]he risk of a wrongful use of the domain name at issue is even higher in the present case, since the Complainant has already been targeted by some cases of phishing in the past few years.”\r\n",
    "other_legal_proceedings": "The Panel is not aware of any other legal proceedings that are pending or decided and that relate to the Disputed Domain Name.",
    "no_response_filed": "No administratively compliant response has been filed.",
    "rights": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Disputed Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the UDRP).  ",
    "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the Disputed Domain Name (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the UDRP).  ",
    "bad_faith": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Disputed Domain Name has been registered and is being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the UDRP).  ",
    "procedural_factors": "The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.",
    "decision": "Accepted",
    "panelists": [
        "Douglas M. Isenberg"
    ],
    "date_of_panel_decision": "2021-06-30 00:00:00",
    "informal_english_translation": "Complainant states, and provides evidence to support, that it is the owner of certain trademark registrations that consist of or contain the mark INTESA SANPAOLO (the “INTESA SANPAOLO Trademark”), including Int’l Reg. No. 920,896 for the mark INTESA SANPAOLO (registered March 7, 2007) and EU Reg. No. 5,301,999 for the mark INTESA SANPAOLO (registered June 18, 2007).",
    "decision_domains": {
        "LOGIN-INTESASANPAOLO.COM": "TRANSFERRED"
    },
    "panelist": null,
    "panellists_text": null
}