{
    "case_number": "CAC-UDRP-103266",
    "time_of_filling": "2021-05-12 10:45:24",
    "domain_names": [
        "iasme.com"
    ],
    "case_administrator": "  Iveta Špiclová   (Czech Arbitration Court) (Case admin)",
    "complainant": [
        "IASME Consortium Ltd"
    ],
    "complainant_representative": null,
    "respondent": [
        "Anonymize, Inc."
    ],
    "respondent_representative": null,
    "factual_background": "The Complainant is IASME Consortium Ltd, a not-for-profit organisation focusing on small and medium enterprises (SMEs), whose term \"I.A.S.M.E\" stands for “Information Assurance for Small and Medium Enterprises Consortium“.\r\n\r\nIASME Consortium Ltd, was incorporated in January, 2014 and is best known as the sole provider of UK government backed schemes to improve Cyber Security controls nationwide, Cyber Essentials and Cyber Essentials Plus. It is very important to the Complainant that customers seeking these services are not given misinformation or advised by an unauthorised party.\r\n\r\nThe disputed domain name is identical to the Complainant's domain name <iasme.co.uk> and also violates a UK trademark UK00003464991 registered by the Complainant.\r\n\r\nThe similarities between the disputed domain name and the Complainant’s domain is being exploited by the current Registrant to operate a Pay-per-click website with content that directly links to IASME’s schemes, suppliers and partners. The direct mention of IASME’s schemes, suppliers and partners indicates that the Registrant is purposely attempting to confuse traffic seeking the Complainant’s domain for financial gain.",
    "other_legal_proceedings": "The Panel is not aware of any other legal proceedings which are pending or decided and which relate to the disputed domain name.",
    "no_response_filed": "The Respondent did not reply to the Complainant’s contentions.\r\n\r\n",
    "rights": "The Complainant has shown the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy).",
    "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy).",
    "bad_faith": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy).",
    "procedural_factors": "As per paragraph 12 of the UDRP Rules, the Panel requested the Complainant to present further statements to clarify certain statements. The Panel provided the Complainant with 5 days in order to comply with the request of the Panel, and provided also 5 days to the Respondent to comment on the new statements filed by the Complainant.The Panel´s decision was extended until 23 July 2021 in order to allow the parties to provide their statements as well as for the Panel to analyze any newly presented submissions. \r\n\r\nThe Complainant complied with the Panel´s request and the Respondent did not submit any comments or response. \r\nThe Panel notes that the Respondent has not participated in any way in the present proceedings. \r\n\r\n",
    "decision": "Accepted",
    "panelists": [
        "Laura Martin-Gamero Schmidt"
    ],
    "date_of_panel_decision": "2021-07-23 00:00:00",
    "informal_english_translation": "IASME Consortium Ltd, was incorporated in January, 2014 and is best known as the sole provider of UK government backed schemes to improve Cyber Security controls nationwide, Cyber Essentials and Cyber Essentials Plus. \r\n\r\nThe Complainant's owns a domain name ‘iasme.co.uk’ and a UK trademark UK00003464991 since 2020. ",
    "decision_domains": {
        "IASME.COM": "TRANSFERRED"
    },
    "panelist": null,
    "panellists_text": null
}