{
    "case_number": "CAC-UDRP-103892",
    "time_of_filling": "2021-06-30 08:43:17",
    "domain_names": [
        "arceloymittal.com"
    ],
    "case_administrator": "  Iveta Špiclová   (Czech Arbitration Court) (Case admin)",
    "complainant": [
        "ARCELORMITTAL (SA)"
    ],
    "complainant_representative": "Nameshield (Enora Millocheau)",
    "respondent": [
        "Asta Yuno"
    ],
    "respondent_representative": null,
    "factual_background": "The Complainant is the largest steel-producing company globally and is the market leader in steel for use in automotive, construction, household appliances, and packaging, with approximately 168,000 employees. \r\n\r\nThe Complainant is the holder of the registered word mark ARCELORMITTAL in several classes in numerous countries and regions worldwide.\r\n\r\nThe disputed domain name <arceloymittal.com> was registered on June 22, 2021. According to evidence provided by the Complainant, it resolves to an index page, and an MX record allowing for the use of an e-mail address connected to the disputed domain name is active.",
    "other_legal_proceedings": "The Panel is not aware of any other legal proceedings which are pending or decided and which relate to the disputed domain name.",
    "no_response_filed": "PARTIES' CONTENTIONS:\r\n\r\nCOMPLAINANT \r\n\r\nThe Complainant considers the disputed domain name confusingly similar to a trademark in which it has rights. The Complainant claims that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name. According to the Complainant, the Respondent does not use the disputed domain name in connection with any legitimate use. Also, according to the Complainant, the Respondent is not known by the disputed domain name and is not related to the Complainant. Finally, the Complainant considers that the disputed domain name was registered and is being used in bad faith. The Complainant contends that the Respondent must have known of the existence of the Complainant’s trademark given its distinctiveness and reputation. The Complainant further claims that the misspelling of the Complainant’s trademark is evidence of bad faith. According to the Complainant, the Respondent has not demonstrated any activity in respect of the disputed domain name, and it is not possible to conceive of any plausible actual or contemplated active use of the disputed domain name by the Respondent that would not be illegitimate.   \r\n\r\n\r\nRESPONDENT\r\n\r\nThe Respondent did not reply to the Complainants’ contentions.",
    "rights": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy).",
    "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy).",
    "bad_faith": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy).",
    "procedural_factors": "The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.",
    "decision": "Accepted",
    "panelists": [
        "Flip Petillion"
    ],
    "date_of_panel_decision": "2021-07-26 00:00:00",
    "informal_english_translation": "The Complainant, ARCELORMITTAL S.A., is the holder of the following registered trademark:\r\n- ArcelorMittal, International word mark registration No. 947686, registered on August 3, 2007 in classes 6, 7, 9, 12, 19, 21, 39, 40, 41 and 42.",
    "decision_domains": {
        "ARCELOYMITTAL.COM": "TRANSFERRED"
    },
    "panelist": null,
    "panellists_text": null
}