{
    "case_number": "CAC-UDRP-104310",
    "time_of_filling": "2022-01-31 08:14:58",
    "domain_names": [
        "bourso-client.com",
        "bourso-login.com"
    ],
    "case_administrator": "  Iveta Špiclová   (Czech Arbitration Court) (Case admin)",
    "complainant": [
        "BOURSORAMA SA"
    ],
    "complainant_representative": "NAMESHIELD S.A.S.",
    "respondent": [
        "Boris MIVAR"
    ],
    "respondent_representative": null,
    "factual_background": "FACTS ASSERTED BY THE COMPLAINANT AND NOT CONTESTED BY THE RESPONDENT:\r\n\r\nComplainant states that the Respondent is a passive holder of the disputed domain names and there is no evidence that the Respondent has any demonstrable plan to use it. The disputed domain names <bourso-client.com> (registered on January 20, 2022) and <bourso-login.com> (registered on January 20, 2022) were registered by the same registrant. The domain name <bourso-client.com> redirects to CMS template; the domain name <bourso-login.com> redirects to the Registrar parking page.",
    "other_legal_proceedings": "The Panel is not aware of any other legal proceedings which are pending or decided and which relate to the disputed domain names.",
    "no_response_filed": "NO ADMINISTRATIVELY COMPLIANT RESPONSE HAS BEEN FILED.\r\n\r\nPARTIES' CONTENTIONS:\r\n\r\nCOMPLAINANT:\r\n\r\nBOURSORAMA S.A. was founded in 1995 concurrent with the emergence of e-commerce and has expanded to fill a range of financial products online. It is a pioneer and leader in its three core businesses: online brokerage, financial information on the Internet, and online banking. It is the online banking preference with over 1.5 million customers. Complainant's portal website at www.boursorama.com was the first national financial and economic information site and first French online banking platform. Complainant alleges that the disputed domain names are confusingly similar to its trademark BOURSO® in that it they include its trademark in its entirety. \r\n\r\nAccording to the Complainant, the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain names, because Complainant has not authorized the Respondent to use the BOURSO trademark, and the disputed domain names do not correspond to the name of the Respondent. The Complainant adds that the Respondent does not carry out a fair or non-commercial use of the disputed domain names as they do not resolve to active websites.\r\n\r\n\r\nRESPONDENT:\r\n\r\nThe Respondent did not respond to the Complainant's contentions and did not submit any arguments or evidence in its defense. In such event, UDRP Rule 14 provides (a) that the \"Panel shall proceed to a decision on the complaint\" and (b) that \"the Panel shall draw such inferences therefrom as it considers appropriate.\" In view of Respondent's failure to submit a response, the Panel shall decide this administrative proceeding on the basis of Complainant's undisputed representations pursuant to paragraphs 5(f), 14(a) and 15(a) of the Rules and draw such inferences it considers appropriate pursuant to paragraph 14(b) of the Rules. The Panel is entitled to accept all reasonable allegations set forth in a complaint; however, the Panel may deny relief where a complaint contains mere conclusory or unsubstantiated arguments. See WIPO Jurisprudential Overview 3.0 at Para. 4.3.\r\n \r\n\r\n",
    "rights": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain names are identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy).",
    "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain names (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy).",
    "bad_faith": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain names have been registered and are being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy).",
    "procedural_factors": "The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.",
    "decision": "Accepted",
    "panelists": [
        "Gerald M. Levine, Ph.D, Esq."
    ],
    "date_of_panel_decision": "2022-02-23 00:00:00",
    "informal_english_translation": "Complainant is the owner of a French trademark BOURSO® n° 3009973 registered on February 22, 2000.",
    "decision_domains": {
        "BOURSO-CLIENT.COM": "TRANSFERRED",
        "BOURSO-LOGIN.COM": "TRANSFERRED"
    },
    "panelist": null,
    "panellists_text": null
}