{
    "case_number": "CAC-UDRP-104321",
    "time_of_filling": "2022-02-04 10:47:26",
    "domain_names": [
        "msk-remont-philips.com",
        "msk-service-saeco.com",
        "remont-philips-spb.com",
        "remont-saeco-msk.com",
        "philips-center.com",
        "saeco-center.com",
        "saeco-repair.com",
        "supportsaeco.com",
        "philips-coffee-service.com",
        "remontphilips.com"
    ],
    "case_administrator": "Denisa Bilík (CAC) (Case admin)",
    "complainant": [
        "Koninklijke Philips N.V. "
    ],
    "complainant_representative": "Coöperatieve Vereniging SNB-REACT U.A.",
    "respondent": [
        "Miraziz Mirvaliev"
    ],
    "respondent_representative": null,
    "factual_background": "FACTS ASSERTED BY THE COMPLAINANT AND NOT CONTESTED BY THE RESPONDENT:\r\n\r\nMULTIPLE DOMAIN NAMES:\r\nAs article 3(c) of the UDRP Rules state: \"The complaint may relate to more than one domain name, provided that the domain names are registered by the same domain-name holder.\"\r\n\r\nIn this case, all of the domain names were registered by  Miraziz Mirvaliev (x8.sultanov@gmail.com). \r\n\r\nLANGUAGE OF THE PROCEEDINGS:\r\n\r\nPursuant to paragraph 11 of the Rules, unless otherwise agreed by the parties, or specified otherwise in the registration agreement, the language of the administrative proceeding shall be the language of the registration agreement. All of the domain names are registered at the registrar “Internet Domain Service BS Corp”.  \r\n\r\nAs the Terms & Conditions of the Registrar at https:\/\/internetbs.net\/en\/termsandconditions.html state: \"The operative and effective version of this Agreement will be the latest version available at http:\/\/www.internetbs.net\/legal\/Internet.bs-RegistrationAgreement.pdf and the Registration Agreement available at that URL is entirely in the English language.\" It should be noted that English is the official language of the Bahamas, and the Registrar operates its website (where registration is performed), in that language. By registering the majority of the domain names at this Registrar, Respondent has also shown his ability to understand the English language.\r\n\r\nFurthermore, there is evidence showing that the respondent can understand the language of the complaint: the domain names contain English words such as 'philips-coffee-service.com', repair, center, support, and service.\r\n",
    "other_legal_proceedings": "The Panel is not aware of any other legal proceedings which are pending or decided and which relate to the disputed domain names.",
    "no_response_filed": "NO ADMINISTRATIVELY COMPLIANT RESPONSE HAS BEEN FILED.\r\n\r\nPARTIES' CONTENTIONS:\r\n\r\nCOMPLAINANT:\r\nThe Complainant contends that The PHILIPS trademark is a well-known and famous brand, which is one of the most widely recognized identities in the world. The PHILIPS trademark is synonymous with a wide spectrum of products varying from consumer electronics to domestic appliances, from security systems to semiconductors. The SAECO trademark is a distinctive, coined word, which originates from the names of the founders of the Saeco company: Sergio, Arthur e Compagnia, and has become famous for high quality espresso machines for domestic use.\r\nAll of the domain names incorporate the entirety of the PHILIPS or SAECO trademark. The Respondent has merely added descriptive or dictionary terms such as ‘support’, ‘repair’, ‘service’, ‘center’, or ‘remont’, which is the Russian word for repairs. In some cases, geographic acronyms are used: ‘msk’, which is short for Moscow, as seen on the connected websites, and ‘spb’ for Saint Petersburg.\r\nAccording to the Complainant, the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain names, because Complainant has not authorized Respondent to use the PHILLIPS and SAECO trademarks. Further Respondent is not using the disputed domain names for any legitimate purpose, is not commonly known by the disputed domain names, and the Respondent expresses no intention to carry out a fair or non-commercial use of the disputed domain names as they do not resolve to active websites.\r\n\r\n\r\nRESPONDENT:\r\nThe Respondent did not respond to the Complainant’s contentions and did not submit any arguments or evidence in its defense. In such event, UDRP Rule 14 provides (a) that the “Panel shall proceed to a decision on the complaint” and (b) that “the Panel shall draw such inferences therefrom as it considers appropriate.” In view of Respondent’s failure to submit a response, the Panel shall decide this administrative proceeding on the basis of Complainant’s undisputed representations pursuant to paragraphs 5(f), 14(a) and 15(a) of the Rules and draw such inferences it considers appropriate pursuant to paragraph 14(b) of the Rules. The Panel is entitled to accept all reasonable allegations set forth in a complaint; however, the Panel may deny relief where a complaint contains mere conclusory or unsubstantiated arguments. See WIPO Jurisprudential Overview 3.0 at Para. 4.3.",
    "rights": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain names are identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy).",
    "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain names (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy).",
    "bad_faith": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain names have been registered and are being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy).",
    "procedural_factors": "The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.",
    "decision": "Accepted",
    "panelists": [
        "Gerald M. Levine, Ph.D, Esq."
    ],
    "date_of_panel_decision": "2022-03-09 00:00:00",
    "informal_english_translation": "The Complainant demonstrates it has trademark(s) or service mark(s) certified in numerous jurisdictions:\r\n- The International trademark word registration No. 310459 for PHILIPS registered on March 16, 1966;\r\n- The International trademark registration No. 991346 for PHILIPS (figurative mark) registered on June 13, 2008. This trademark was designated for “RU” (the Russian Federation) and \"UZ\" (Uzbekistan) as well;\r\n- The European Union trademark No. 000205971 for PHILIPS (word mark) filed on April 1, 1996 and registered on October 22, 1999;\r\n- The International trademark No. 576295A for the Saeco logo (figurative mark), registered since April 12, 1991. This trademark was designated for “RU” (the Russian Federation) as well;\r\n-The European Union trademark No. 8278236 for the Saeco logo (figurative mark), registered since January 19, 2010;\r\n- The European Union trademark No. 3962313 for the Saeco logo (figurative mark), registered since November 21, 2005; and\r\n-The International trademark No. 802395C for the Saeco logo (figurative mark, registered since March 27, 2003. The trademark was designated for \"UZ\" (Uzbekistan) as well.",
    "decision_domains": {
        "MSK-REMONT-PHILIPS.COM": "TRANSFERRED",
        "MSK-SERVICE-SAECO.COM": "TRANSFERRED",
        "REMONT-PHILIPS-SPB.COM": "TRANSFERRED",
        "REMONT-SAECO-MSK.COM": "TRANSFERRED",
        "PHILIPS-CENTER.COM": "TRANSFERRED",
        "SAECO-CENTER.COM": "TRANSFERRED",
        "SAECO-REPAIR.COM": "TRANSFERRED",
        "SUPPORTSAECO.COM": "TRANSFERRED",
        "PHILIPS-COFFEE-SERVICE.COM": "TRANSFERRED",
        "REMONTPHILIPS.COM": "TRANSFERRED"
    },
    "panelist": null,
    "panellists_text": null
}