{
    "case_number": "CAC-UDRP-104323",
    "time_of_filling": "2022-02-02 09:17:48",
    "domain_names": [
        "PORTALE-INTESA.COM"
    ],
    "case_administrator": "  Iveta Špiclová   (Czech Arbitration Court) (Case admin)",
    "complainant": [
        "Intesa Sanpaolo S.p.A."
    ],
    "complainant_representative": "Intesa Sanpaolo S.p.A.",
    "respondent": [
        "raffa mutigno"
    ],
    "respondent_representative": null,
    "factual_background": "FACTS ASSERTED BY THE COMPLAINANT AND NOT CONTESTED BY THE RESPONDENT:\r\n\r\nThe Complainant is a leading Italian banking group and also one of the protagonists in the European financial arena. The Complainant is among the top banking groups in the euro zone, and the leader in Italy, in all business areas (retail, corporate and wealth management). The Complainant offers its services to approximately 13,5 million customers.\r\n\r\nThe Complainant uses its trademarks and domain names in connection to its activities worldwide.\r\n\r\nThe Respondent registered the disputed domain name <portale-intesa.com> on 3 February 2021 (\"the disputed domain name\"). The disputed domain name is not used for an active website, and it appears that it is currently blocked by Google Safe Browsing because of suspected phishing activity.",
    "other_legal_proceedings": "The Panel is not aware of any other legal proceedings which are pending or decided and which relate to the disputed domain name.",
    "no_response_filed": "NO ADMINISTRATIVELY COMPLIANT RESPONSE HAS BEEN FILED.\r\n",
    "rights": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown that the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy).\r\n",
    "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy).\r\n",
    "bad_faith": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name to have been registered and being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy).\r\n",
    "procedural_factors": "The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.\r\n",
    "decision": "Accepted",
    "panelists": [
        "Tom  Joris Heremans"
    ],
    "date_of_panel_decision": "2022-03-16 00:00:00",
    "informal_english_translation": "The Complainant is the owner of several trademarks and domain names including the words \"INTESA\" and \"SANPAOLO\" separately or together.\r\n\r\nIn particular, the Complainant is the owner of the following “INTESA” and \"INTESA SANPAOLO\" trademarks:\r\n- International trademark registration n° 793367 “INTESA”, in class 36, priority 4 September 2002;\r\n- International trademark registration n° 920896 “INTESA SANPAOLO”, in classes 9, 16, 35, 36, 41, 42, priority 7 March 2007; \r\n- EU trademark registration n° 12247979 “INTESA”, in classes 9, 16, 35, 36, 38, 41 and 42, priority 23 October 2013;\r\n- EU trademark registration n° 5301999 “INTESA SANPAOLO”, in classes 35, 36 and 38, priority 8 September 2006.\r\n\r\n(the “Complainant's trademarks\").\r\n\r\nThe Complainant asserts to have domain names consisting of the wording \"INTESA\" and \"INTESA SANPAOLO\", such as <intesasanpaolo.com> and <intesa-sanpaolo.com>, which are connected to the official website of the Complainant  (\"the Complainant's domain names\").",
    "decision_domains": {
        "PORTALE-INTESA.COM": "TRANSFERRED"
    },
    "panelist": null,
    "panellists_text": null
}