{
    "case_number": "CAC-UDRP-100345",
    "time_of_filling": "2011-11-25 10:58:45",
    "domain_names": [
        "ECCODEUTSCHLAND.COM"
    ],
    "case_administrator": "Tereza Bartošková (Case admin)",
    "complainant": [
        "ECCO Sko A\/S"
    ],
    "complainant_representative": "Chas. Hude A\/S",
    "respondent": [
        "Robert Parker"
    ],
    "respondent_representative": null,
    "factual_background": "FACTS ASSERTED BY THE COMPLAINANT AND NOT CONTESTED BY THE RESPONDENT:\r\n\r\nThe disputed domain name contains Complainant's trademark ECCO in full. The addition of the country name DEUTSCHLAND does not preclude the risk of confusion \/ likelihood of association with the Complainant’s trademark and company name. Therefore, the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to Complainant's trademark (Policy, Par. 4 (a)(1)).\r\n\r\nRespondent has no rights in the trademark ECCO and is not a reseller\/licensee of Complainant, use of the trademark ECCO by Respondent has never been authorized by Complainant. Accordingly, Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the domain name (policy, Par. 4 (a)(11)).\r\n\r\nThe fact that the Complainant’s trademark ECCO constitutes the dominant element of the disputed domain name, and that the Complainant’s logo and pictures taken from Complainant's website and catalogue are used by the Respondent without the rightful owner’s authorization constitute strong evidence of the fact that the Respondent is attempting to divert Internet users to his domain name by creating a likelihood of confusion with the Complainant’s trademarks, company name and domain names. \r\n\r\nFurthermore, the Respondent is exploiting the goodwill attached to Complainant's trademarks for selling goods which are very likely counterfeit. \r\n\r\nThe Complainant is also of the opinion that, in these particular circumstances, the Respondent’s use of a privacy service to hide his real name and address must be considered an evidence of the Respondent’s bad faith registration and use of the disputed domain name.\r\n\r\nFor all these reasons, Complainant finds that the disputed domain name was registered and is used in bad faith (Policy, Par. 4(a)(iii)).\r\n\r\nIn all the aforementioned circumstances, Complainant finds that the disputed domain name has been registered and is used in bad faith. \r\n\r\nCAC’s and WIPO’s decisions in the following complaint proceedings support the case:\r\n\r\nCAC:\r\nCase No. 100259, ECCOSHOESSHOP.COM\r\nCase No. 100278, ECCOSHOESUK.NET\r\nCase No. 100311, UKECCOSHOES.NET\r\nCase No. 100321, ECCOSKOUDSALG.COM\r\nCase No. 100312, ECCOSALEONLINE.COM\r\nCase No. 100305, ECCOONLINESALE.COM\r\n\r\nWIPO:\r\nCase No. D2010-2038, ECCODISCOUNT.COM \r\n(http:\/\/www.wipo.int\/amc\/en\/domains\/search\/text.jsp?case=D2010-2038) \r\nCase No. D2010-1443, ECCOBRANDSHOP.COM, ECOOSHOP.COM\r\nhttp:\/\/www.wipo.int\/amc\/en\/domains\/search\/text.jsp?case=D2010-1443)\r\nCase No. D2010-1113, 51ECCO.COM\r\n(http:\/\/www.wipo.int\/amc\/en\/domains\/search\/text.jsp?case=D2010-1113)\r\nCase No. D2010-0650, ECCOSHOESOUTLET.COM, ECCOSHOESOUTLETS.COM, ECCOSHOESOUTLETS.NET \r\n(http:\/\/www.wipo.int\/amc\/en\/domains\/decisions\/text\/2010\/d2010-0650.html) ",
    "other_legal_proceedings": "",
    "no_response_filed": "NO ADMINISTRATIVELY COMPLIANT RESPONSE HAS BEEN FILED.",
    "rights": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i)of the Policy).",
    "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the Domain Name (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii)of the Policy).",
    "bad_faith": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Domain Name has been registered and is being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii)of the Policy).",
    "procedural_factors": "The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.",
    "decision": "Accepted",
    "panelists": [
        "Mike Rodenbaugh"
    ],
    "date_of_panel_decision": "2011-12-30 00:00:00",
    "informal_english_translation": "The Complainant is the owner of trademark registrations for ECCO in several jurisdictions worldwide, among others the following, in classes that include leatherware or footware:\r\n\r\nCommunity Trademark Reg. No. 001149871, reg. date 06\/02\/2003\r\nCommunity Trademark Reg. No. 002967040, reg. date 02\/05\/2007\r\nUS Trademark Reg. No. 1935123, reg. date 14\/11\/1995\r\nCanadian Trademark Reg. No. 280654, reg. date 26\/03\/1983\r\nAustralian Trademark reg. No. 375267, reg. date 10\/05\/1982\r\nChinese Trademark Reg. No. 208743, reg. date 30\/05\/1984.\r\n\r\nIn addition, the Complainant has a large portfolio of domain names consisting of, or containing, the trademark ECCO, including ECCO.COM, ECCOSHOE.COM, ECCOSHOES.COM, ECCOSHOES.ASIA, ECCOBRANDSHOP.COM, ECCOSHOPS.COM, ECCOSHOPS.DK, ECCO-SHOP.DK and ECCOSHOPPING.NL.",
    "decision_domains": {
        "ECCODEUTSCHLAND.COM": "TRANSFERRED"
    },
    "panelist": null,
    "panellists_text": null
}