{
    "case_number": "CAC-UDRP-100549",
    "time_of_filling": "2013-01-08 16:11:56",
    "domain_names": [
        "REMEYMARTIN.COM"
    ],
    "case_administrator": "Lada Válková (Case admin)",
    "complainant": [
        "E. REMY MARTIN & C°"
    ],
    "complainant_representative": "Nameshield (Laurent Becker)",
    "respondent": [
        "Kevin Wall"
    ],
    "respondent_representative": null,
    "factual_background": "FACTS ASSERTED BY THE COMPLAINANT AND NOT CONTESTED BY THE RESPONDENT:\r\n\r\nThe Complainant owns and communicates on the Internet through various websites worldwide. The main one is “www.remymartin.com” (registered on 25\/09\/1997), but the Complainant has also registered numerous domain names similar to trademark “REMY MARTIN” such as:\r\n\r\nremy-martin.com registered on 06\/10\/1998\r\nremymartin.net registered on 11\/12\/2001\r\nremy-martin.net registered on 28\/08\/2009\r\nremymartin.fr registered on 28\/07\/1996\r\nremy-martin.fr registered on 27\/12\/2001\r\nremymartin.in registered on 21\/09\/2006\r\nremymartin.asia registered on 10\/12\/2007\r\nremy-martin.asia registered on 07\/12\/2007\r\nremymartin.cn registered on 17\/03\/2003\r\nremy-martin.cn registered on 17\/03\/2003\r\nremymartinvsop.com registered on 23\/02\/2011\r\nremymartin.us registered on 19\/04\/2002 \r\nremymartinv.com registered on 15\/06\/2010\r\nremymartin-xohonors.com registered on 01\/12\/2005\r\n",
    "other_legal_proceedings": "No other legal proceedings are known.",
    "no_response_filed": "NO ADMINISTRATIVELY COMPLIANT RESPONSE HAS BEEN FILED.",
    "rights": "As said, Complainant is, inter alia, the record owner of various trademark registrations in several countries. Therefore, the Complainant has trademark rights within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy.\r\n\r\n",
    "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the domain name (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy).\r\n\r\nWith regards to the disputed “remeymartin.com” domain name, the practice of the Respondent of typosquatting demonstrates a lack of rights or legitimate interests pursuant to ICANN Policy Paragraph 4(a)(ii).  See Nat’l Ass’n of Prof’l Baseball Leagues, Inc. v. Zuccarini, D2002-1011 (WIPO Jan. 21, 2003) (“Typosquatting … as a means of redirecting consumers against their will to another site, does not qualify as a bona fide offering of goods or services, whatever may be the goods or services offered at that site.”); see also IndyMac Bank F.S.B. v. Ebeyer, FA 175292 (Nat. Arb. Forum Sept. 19, 2003) (finding that the respondent lacked rights and legitimate interests in the disputed domain names because it “engaged in the practice of typosquatting by taking advantage of Internet users who attempt to access Complainant's “indymac.com” website but mistakenly misspell Complainant's mark by typing the letter ‘x’ instead of the letter ‘c’”).\r\n",
    "bad_faith": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy).\r\n\r\nA review of the web pages shows that the web page was set up with a view to commercial gain from “click-through” payments from internet users who make mistakes typing in the web sites of the Complainants. The links of the disputed web pages to which the domain names at issue resolve lead to other topics related to, inter alia, alcoholic drinks. This evidences the bad faith of the registration.\r\n\r\nThe before said is not influenced by the fact that the content of the domain has been edited and the former links have been deleted.\r\n",
    "procedural_factors": "The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision. In line with the complaint check, the Case Administrator asked the Complainant whether to switch the Respondent since the present Respondent informed the Case Administrator to be only the Registrar. The Complainant amended the complaint in order to sue the right Respondent. As no administratively compliant response has been filed, a simplified decision was due.",
    "decision": "Accepted",
    "panelists": [
        "Dominik Eickemeier"
    ],
    "date_of_panel_decision": "2013-02-25 00:00:00",
    "informal_english_translation": "Complainant is, inter alia, the record owner of the following registrations in several countries:\r\n\r\nTrademark Country Registration Number Registration Date\r\nREMY MARTIN International 203744, 02.10.1957\r\nREMY MARTIN International 236184, 01.10.1960\r\nREMY MARTIN International 508092, 01.12.1986\r\nREMY MARTIN International 552765, 30.03.1990\r\nREMY MARTIN International 1021309, 18.09.2009\r\nREMY MARTIN US 0749501, 14.05.1963\r\nREMY MARTIN US 1027514 ,16.12.1975\r\n\r\n",
    "decision_domains": {
        "REMEYMARTIN.COM": "TRANSFERRED"
    },
    "panelist": null,
    "panellists_text": null
}