{
    "case_number": "CAC-UDRP-100564",
    "time_of_filling": "2013-03-05 16:05:57",
    "domain_names": [
        "ruouremymartin.com"
    ],
    "case_administrator": "Lada Válková (Case admin)",
    "complainant": [
        "E. REMY MARTIN & C°"
    ],
    "complainant_representative": null,
    "respondent": [
        "Tuan Nguyen Anh"
    ],
    "respondent_representative": null,
    "factual_background": "FACTS ASSERTED BY THE COMPLAINANT AND NOT CONTESTED BY THE RESPONDENT:\r\n\r\nWith its Complaint, filed on 5 March 2013, the Complainant showed (and provided copies thereof as Annex 3) that “REMY MARTIN” is a cognac brand produced by E. REMY MARTIN & C°. It was established in 1724 by two wine-growers and became, by the end of the 19th century, a trading house with an international reputation.\r\n\r\nIn addition, the Complainant proved by means of an extract taken from the Google translator-website (Annex 5) that the term “RUOU” means \"wine\" in Vietnamese language.\r\n\r\nThe Complainant particularly relies on two UDRP-decisions:\r\n- ADR Case n° 100548 E. REMY MARTIN & C vs Fred Frampton <buyremymartin.com>, <remymartinlouisxiii.com>, <louisxiiicognac.com>\r\n- Wipo Case n°D2012-0735 E. Remy Martin & Co vs Giammario Villa <remymartinxo.com> <remymartinvs.com>\r\n\r\nOn 7 March 2013, the ADR Center of the Czech Arbitration Court notified the Respondent that an administrative proceeding has commenced against it pursuant to the Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy and Rules and set a term as of 20 days (i.e. until 27 March 2013) to file a response. Subsequently, on 20 March 2013, the ADR Centre of the Czech Arbitration Court reminded the Respondent of the upcoming expiration of that term.\r\n",
    "other_legal_proceedings": "The Panel is not aware of any other legal proceedings that are pending or decided and that relate to the disputed domain name.",
    "no_response_filed": "NO ADMINISTRATIVELY COMPLIANT RESPONSE HAS BEEN FILED.\r\n",
    "rights": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown that the domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy).",
    "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the domain name (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy).",
    "bad_faith": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown that the domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy).",
    "procedural_factors": "The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under the UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.",
    "decision": "Accepted",
    "panelists": [
        "Dr. Tobias Malte Müller"
    ],
    "date_of_panel_decision": "2013-04-15 00:00:00",
    "informal_english_translation": "RIGHTS ASSERTED BY THE COMPLAINANT AND NOT CONTESTED BY THE RESPONDENT\r\n\r\nThe Complainant has shown (and provided copies thereof as Annex 3) that Complainant owns numerous trademark registrations containing or consisting of terms “REMY MARTIN” in many countries, such as (Trademark\/Country\/Registration Number\/Registration Date):\r\n\r\nREMY MARTIN International 203744 02.10.1957\r\nREMY MARTIN International 236184 01.10.1960\r\nREMY MARTIN International 508092 01.12.1986\r\nREMY MARTIN International 552765 30.03.1990\r\nREMY MARTIN International 1021309 18.09.2009\r\nREMY MARTIN International 862523 15.02.2005\r\nREMY MARTIN International 629594 04.01.1995\r\nREMY MARTIN US 0749501 14.05.1963\r\nREMY MARTIN US 1027514 16.12.1975",
    "decision_domains": {
        "RUOUREMYMARTIN.COM": "TRANSFERRED"
    }
}