{
    "case_number": "CAC-UDRP-100683",
    "time_of_filling": "2013-10-16 10:30:56",
    "domain_names": [
        "remimartine.com"
    ],
    "case_administrator": "Lada Válková (Case admin)",
    "complainant": [
        "E. REMY MARTIN & C°"
    ],
    "complainant_representative": "Nameshield (Laurent Becker)",
    "respondent": [
        "Cynthia  Gardner"
    ],
    "respondent_representative": null,
    "factual_background": "FACTS ASSERTED BY THE COMPLAINANT AND NOT CONTESTED BY THE RESPONDENT:\r\n\r\nConfirmation of the reputation of the Complainant and the \"REMY MARTIN\" mark may be found from the previous CAC, WIPO, national registry domain names and Court Decisions, such as:\r\n\r\nADR 100564 <ruouremymartin.com> and <buyremymartin.com>  E. REMY MARTIN & C° vs Tuan Nguyen Anh\r\nWIPO 100548 <remymartinlouisxiii.com> and <louisxiiicognac.com> E. REMY MARTIN & C° \tvs Fred Frampton\r\nWIPO D2012-0735 <remymartinxo.com> and <remymartinvs.com> E. Remy Martin & Co vs Giammario Villa\r\nWIPO D2012-0077 <cognacremymartin.com> and <cognac-remymartin.com> E. Remy Martin & C° and Jerome Salem, Trednet\r\nWIPO D2011-0523 <remymartinvsop.com> CLS Rémy Cointreau SAS et E. Remy Martin & Co vs PrivacyProtect.org, Domain Admin \/ Ke Zhao\r\n\r\nOn those facts, the Complainant contends that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar and phonetically identical to its earlier well-known trademark REMY MARTIN® in which the Complainant has prior rights.",
    "other_legal_proceedings": "The Panel is not aware of any other legal proceedings in connection with the domain name.",
    "no_response_filed": "NO ADMINISTRATIVELY COMPLIANT RESPONSE HAS BEEN FILED. However, a letter signed by Cynthia Gardner was received on 27 November 2013. She declares she had no knowledge of the registration of this domain name and claims the use of her name in the registration of the domain name was fraudulent.\r\nThe Panel cannot ascertain whether these allegations are true, but in any case, these do not affect the decision of the Panel included hereinbelow.\r\n\r\n",
    "rights": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Domain Name is confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i)of the Policy).\r\n",
    "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the Domain Name (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii)of the Policy).\r\n",
    "bad_faith": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Domain Name has been registered and is being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii)of the Policy).\r\n",
    "procedural_factors": "The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.",
    "decision": "Accepted",
    "panelists": [
        "Jose Checa"
    ],
    "date_of_panel_decision": "2013-11-27 00:00:00",
    "informal_english_translation": "The Complainant has submitted trademark certificates for a number of countries around the world, including US Trademark No. 0749501 for the Word Mark REMY MARTIN, filing date May 15, 1962. To the knowledge of the Panellist, the mentioned trademark is still valid and in force. ",
    "decision_domains": {
        "REMIMARTINE.COM": "TRANSFERRED"
    },
    "panelist": null,
    "panellists_text": null
}