{
    "case_number": "CAC-UDRP-100984",
    "time_of_filling": "2015-04-29 15:42:03",
    "domain_names": [
        "Credits-agricole.com"
    ],
    "case_administrator": "Lada Válková (Case admin)",
    "complainant": [
        "CREDIT AGRICOLE S.A."
    ],
    "complainant_representative": "Nameshield (Anne Morin)",
    "respondent": [
        "Cyril willaims"
    ],
    "respondent_representative": null,
    "factual_background": "FACTS ASSERTED BY THE COMPLAINANT AND NOT CONTESTED BY THE RESPONDENT:\r\n\r\n1. The Complainant is a leading retail bank resident in France and is active in France and throughout the world. Despite several trademarks for Credit Agricole it is also the proprietor of several domain names incorporating „Credit Agricole“ such as CREDIT-AGRICOLE.net.\r\n\r\n\r\n2. The Respondent registered the disputed domain name on April 21, 2015 where a parking page is displayed. \r\n",
    "other_legal_proceedings": "Other pending proceedings between the parties are not known to the Panel.",
    "no_response_filed": "PARTIES' CONTENTIONS:\r\n\r\nCOMPLAINANT:\r\n\r\nThe Complainant contends that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the trademarks of Complainant. The additional „s“ is not sufficient to avoid a confusing similarity. Furthermore, it is a typical case of typosquatting.\r\n\r\nThe Complainant contends that it never authorized Respondent to use the disputed domain name or is affiliated with the Respondent. \r\n\r\nDue to, inter alia, the reputation of Complainant´s trademarks confirmed by other ADR panels such as in the case CAC 100688 Credit Agricole S.A. v. Empark, it must be assumed that the disputed domain name was registered and used with full knowledge of the Complainant. The given typosquatting shows bad faith using the disputed domain name.\r\n\r\n\r\nRESPONDENT:\r\n\r\nNO ADMINISTRATIVELY COMPLIANT RESPONSE HAS BEEN FILED.",
    "rights": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i)of the Policy).",
    "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the Domain Name (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii)of the Policy).",
    "bad_faith": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Domain Name has been registered and is being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii)of the Policy).",
    "procedural_factors": "The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.",
    "decision": "Accepted",
    "panelists": [
        "Dietrich Beier"
    ],
    "date_of_panel_decision": "2015-06-15 00:00:00",
    "informal_english_translation": "The Complainant is proprietor of several trademarks for „Credit Agricole“, among them the Community Trademark 006456974 applied for on November 13, 2007 and registered on October 23, 2008 in classes 9, 16, 35, 36, 38, 42 as well as International Registration 1064647 registered on January 4, 2011 in classes 9, 16, 35, 36, 38, 42 in several countries. ",
    "decision_domains": {
        "CREDITS-AGRICOLE.COM": "TRANSFERRED"
    },
    "panelist": null,
    "panellists_text": null
}