{
    "case_number": "CAC-UDRP-101020",
    "time_of_filling": "2015-07-22 10:40:22",
    "domain_names": [
        "arcelormittals.com",
        "arrcelormittal.com",
        "arccelormittal.com"
    ],
    "case_administrator": "Lada Válková (Case admin)",
    "complainant": [
        "ArcelorMittal SA"
    ],
    "complainant_representative": "Nameshield (Anne Morin)",
    "respondent": [
        "VistaPrint Technologies Ltd"
    ],
    "respondent_representative": null,
    "factual_background": "FACTS ASSERTED BY THE COMPLAINANT AND NOT CONTESTED BY THE RESPONDENT:\r\n\r\nThe Complainant, ArcelorMittal S.A. is a large steel producing company with operations around the world. \r\n\r\nThe Complainant owns the International trade mark registration for ARCELORMITTAL and the domain name <arcelormittal.com>.\r\n\r\nThe disputed domain names were registered by the Respondent of as follows:\r\n<arcelomittals.com> on 2 July 2015;\t\r\n< arrcelomittal.com> on 2 July 2015; and \r\n<arccelomittal.com> on 16 July 2015. ",
    "other_legal_proceedings": "The Panel is not aware of any other legal proceedings which are pending or decided and which relate to the disputed domain names.",
    "no_response_filed": "NO ADMINISTRATIVELY COMPLIANT RESPONSE HAS BEEN FILED.\r\n\r\nCOMPLAINANTS' CONTENTIONS:\r\n\r\nAs far as the Complainant contentions are concerned, the Complainant claims the disputed domain names to be confusingly similar to its trademark. Furthermore, the Complainant contends that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interest in the disputed domain names. Finally, the Complainant states that the disputed domain names have been registered and used in bad faith. \r\n\r\nThe Complainant refers to the following cases to support its submissions:\r\n\r\nCAC - 100831 - ArcelorMittal S.A. v. Anton M Bahtin - <arcel0rmittal.com>\r\nCAC - 100740 - ArcelorMittal S.A. v. arcelornnittal - <arcelornnittal.com>\r\nCAC - 100689 - ArcelorMittal S.A. v. desmond smith - <arcellormital.com>\r\nCAC - 100573 - ArcelorMittal S.A. v. David Albert - <arcelormmittal.com>\r\nCAC - 100438 - ArcelorMittal S.A. v. Above.com Domain Privacy <arselormittal.com>\r\nCAC - 100359 - ArcelorMittal S.A. v. Above.com Domain Privacy <accelormittal.com> and <arcelormitta.com>\r\nNAF - FA699652 - Braun Corp. v. Loney\r\nNAF - FA139720 - Tercent Inc. v. Lee Yi\r\nWIPO - D2014-1387 - Tetra Laval Holdings & Finance S.A. v. VistaPrint Technologies Ltd\r\nWIPO - D2012-0744 - Riot Games, Inc. v. Maik Baumgartner\r\nWIPO - D2011-0060 - Allstate Insurance Company v. Anunet Pvt Ltd.\r\nWIPO - D2011-0830 - Geoffrey, LLC v. Toys R Russ and Days of ‘49\r\nWIPO - D2000-0003 - Telstra Corporation Limited v. Nuclear Marshmallows\r\nWIPO - D2000-0400 - CBS Broadcasting, Inc. v. Dennis Toeppen\r\nWIPO - D2014-1387 - Tetra Laval Holdings & Finance S.A. v. VistaPrint Technologies Ltd\r\nWIPO - D2015-0863 - The Net-A-Porter Group Limited v. VistaPrint Technologies Ltd. \r\nWIPO - D2015-0819 - Barry Callebaut AG Barry Callebaut Belgium NV v. VistaPrint Technologies Ltd. \r\nWIPO - D2015-0769 - Carrefour v. VistaPrint Technologies Ltd. \r\nCAC - 100957 - EUTELSAT SA v. VistaPrint Technologies Ltd. \r\nCAC - 100938 - BOEHRINGER Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG v. VistaPrint Technologies Ltd.",
    "rights": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Domain Names are confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i)of the Policy).",
    "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the Domain Names (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii)of the Policy).",
    "bad_faith": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Domain Names have been registered and are being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii)of the Policy).",
    "procedural_factors": "The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under the UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.",
    "decision": "Accepted",
    "panelists": [
        "Mrs Veronica  Bailey"
    ],
    "date_of_panel_decision": "2015-08-28 00:00:00",
    "informal_english_translation": "The Complainant is owner of International trade mark No. 947686 for the mark ARCELORMITTAL, which was registered on 3 August 2007 in classes 7, 9, 12, 19, 21, 39, 40, 41 and 42.\r\n\r\nThe Complainant also the registrant of the domain name <arcelormittal.com> which was registered on 27 January 2006.",
    "decision_domains": {
        "ARCELORMITTALS.COM": "TRANSFERRED",
        "ARRCELORMITTAL.COM": "TRANSFERRED",
        "ARCCELORMITTAL.COM": "TRANSFERRED"
    },
    "panelist": null,
    "panellists_text": null
}