{
    "case_number": "CAC-UDRP-101076",
    "time_of_filling": "2015-10-07 12:19:11",
    "domain_names": [
        "adafabet.com"
    ],
    "case_administrator": "Lada Válková (Case admin)",
    "complainant": [
        "Emphasis Services Limited"
    ],
    "complainant_representative": null,
    "respondent": [
        "nickky hode"
    ],
    "respondent_representative": null,
    "factual_background": "FACTS ASSERTED BY THE COMPLAINANT AND NOT CONTESTED BY THE RESPONDENT:\r\n\r\nThe Complainant through its subsidiaries and licensees owns and operates several websites under the brand \"DAFA\" (e.g. <www.dafabet.com>) where online gaming and betting is offered. The Complainant has, for more than 14 years, used the term \"DAFA\" in varying combinations to designate its online gaming and betting offerings. The Complainant owns various trademarks in different jurisdictions in relation to the term \"DAFA \"and in particular to \"DAFABET\". The Complainant alleges that \"DAFABET\" is a well-known trademark due to sponsorship with football clubs, the English Premier League and the World Snooker Championship. In fact, \"DAFABET\" is currently the Official Main Club Sponsor for Sunderland and Blackburn Rovers Football Clubs, Official International Betting Partners for Everton and Celtic Football Clubs. Furthermore, \"DAFABET\" has also sponsored high level sporting events.\r\n\r\nThe Disputed Domain Name, that according to the information provided in the WHOIS has been created on 5 September 2014, redirects to a web site whose content is basically a clone of the Complainant’s website. In fact on that website the Complainant’s graphics, images, designs, content and logos are used without the Complainant’s consent. The Respondent has been sent a cease and desist letter, but according to the Complainant, no reply was received so far.",
    "other_legal_proceedings": "The Panel is not aware of any other legal proceedings pending or decided between the same parties and relating to the Disputed Domain Name. ",
    "no_response_filed": "NO ADMINISTRATIVELY COMPLIANT RESPONSE HAS BEEN FILED.\r\n\r\n",
    "rights": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i)of the Policy).",
    "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the Domain Name (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii)of the Policy).",
    "bad_faith": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Domain Name has been registered and is being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii)of the Policy).",
    "procedural_factors": "The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.",
    "decision": "Accepted",
    "panelists": [
        "Dr. Tobias Malte Müller"
    ],
    "date_of_panel_decision": "2015-11-16 00:00:00",
    "informal_english_translation": "The Complainant is the owner of several trademarks consisting and\/or containing the term “DAFA” (for instance: Hong Kong registration No. 302048148 “DAFA”, of 03 October 2011, for services in class 41 and Community trademark registration No. 012067088 “DAFABET”, of 17 February 2014, for services in classes 38 and 41). Moreover it uses the domains “www.dafabet.com” and “www.dafa888.com”.",
    "decision_domains": {
        "ADAFABET.COM": "TRANSFERRED"
    },
    "panelist": null,
    "panellists_text": null
}