{
    "case_number": "CAC-UDRP-104468",
    "time_of_filling": "2022-04-01 09:41:57",
    "domain_names": [
        "LNTESAWEBACCESSO.COM"
    ],
    "case_administrator": "Denisa Bilík (CAC) (Case admin)",
    "complainant": [
        "Intesa Sanpaolo S.p.A."
    ],
    "complainant_representative": "Intesa Sanpaolo S.p.A.",
    "respondent": [
        "Gino Monsignore"
    ],
    "respondent_representative": null,
    "factual_background": "FACTS ASSERTED BY THE COMPLAINANT AND NOT CONTESTED BY THE RESPONDENT:\r\n\r\nTHE DOMAIN NAME IS IDENTICAL OR CONFUSINGLY SIMILAR TO A TRADEMARK OR SERVICE MARK IN WHICH THE COMPLAINANT HAS RIGHTS\r\n\r\nThe Complainant is the leading Italian banking group and also one of the protagonists in the European financial arena. The Complainant is the company resulting from the merger (effective as of January 1, 2007) between Banca Intesa S.p.A. and Sanpaolo IMI S.p.A., two of the top Italian banking groups.\r\nThe Complainant is among the top banking groups in the euro zone, with a market capitalisation exceeding 44.6 billion euro, and the undisputed leader in Italy, in all business areas (retail, corporate and wealth management). Thanks to a network of approximately 3,700 branches throughout Italy, with market shares of more than 17% in most Italian regions, the group offers its services to approximately 13.5 million customers.\r\n \r\nThe Complainant's international network specialised in supporting corporate customers is present in 25 countries, in particular in the Mediterranean area and those areas where Italian companies are most active, such as the United States, Russia, China and India. \r\n\r\nThe disputed domain name <LNTESAWEBACCESSO.COM> has been registered by the Respondent on July 8, 2021. \r\n\r\nOn 30 May 2017, the Complainant's lawyers sent a cease and desist letter to the Respondent requesting the voluntary transfer of the disputed domain name to the Complainant. Despite this notice, the Respondent did not comply with this request. Currently, the disputed domain name is connected to a website, which has been blocked by Google Safe Browsing through a warning page. The disputed domain name is currently passively held. \r\n\r\nThe Complainant states, that it is more than obvious that the domain name at issue is identical, or — at least — confusingly similar, to the Complainant's trademarks \"INTESA SANPAOLO\" and \"INTESA\". In the opinion of the Complainant, LNTESAWEBACCESSO.COM exactly reproduces the well-known trademark \"INTESA\", with the mere substitution of the letter \"I\" with an \"L\" (a clear example of typosquatting) and the addition of the Italian expression \"WEB ACCESSO\", meaning \"WEB ACCESS\".\r\n\r\nThe Complainant states, that the main purpose of the Respondent was to use the disputed domain name for \"phishing\" financial information in an attempt to defraud the Complainant's customers and that Google promptly stopped the illicit activity carried out by the Respondent.",
    "other_legal_proceedings": "The Panel is not aware of any other legal proceedings which are pending or decided and which relate to the disputed domain name.",
    "no_response_filed": "NO ADMINISTRATIVELY COMPLIANT RESPONSE HAS BEEN FILED.",
    "rights": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy).",
    "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy).",
    "bad_faith": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy).",
    "procedural_factors": "The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.",
    "decision": "Accepted",
    "panelists": [
        "Dominik Eickemeier"
    ],
    "date_of_panel_decision": "2022-05-05 00:00:00",
    "informal_english_translation": "The Complainant is the owner, among others, of the trademark registrations bearing “INTESA SANPAOLO” and “INTESA”, such as:\r\n\r\n- Int. Trademark no. 920869 – “INTESA SANPAOLO” – Nice Classification: 9, 16, 35, 36, 41, 42 - Date of reg. March 7, 2007;\r\n- EU. Trademark no. 5301999 – “INTESA SANPAOLO” – Nice Classification: 35, 36, 38 - Date of reg. June 16, 2007;\r\n- Int. Trademark no. 793367 – “INTESA” – Nice Classification: 36 - Date of reg. September 4, 2002;\r\n- EU Trademark no. 12247979 “INTESA” – Nice Classification: 9, 16, 35, 36, 38, 41, 42 - Date of reg. May 5, 2014.\r\n\r\nFurthermore, the Complainant is the owner of several domain names, bearing “INTESA SANPAOLO” or “INTESA”, such as <INTESASANPAOLO.COM>, <INTESA-SANPAOLO.COM> and <INTESA.COM>.",
    "decision_domains": {
        "LNTESAWEBACCESSO.COM": "TRANSFERRED"
    },
    "panelist": null,
    "panellists_text": null
}