{
    "case_number": "CAC-UDRP-104453",
    "time_of_filling": "2022-03-30 09:27:33",
    "domain_names": [
        "grouponet.com"
    ],
    "case_administrator": "Denisa Bilík (CAC) (Case admin)",
    "complainant": [
        "ONET"
    ],
    "complainant_representative": "NAMESHIELD S.A.S.",
    "respondent": [
        "Superstack Domain"
    ],
    "respondent_representative": null,
    "factual_background": "FACTS ASSERTED BY THE COMPLAINANT AND NOT CONTESTED BY THE RESPONDENT:\r\n\r\nFounded as a family business in 1860, the Complainant has become an international group of engineering and services companies. With a presence in 9 countries, more than 70,000 employees and 23,000 clients, the Complainant’s annual turnover amounts to 1.9 billion euros.\r\n\r\nThe Complainant uses the domain name <groupeonet.com>, which was registered on October 15th, 1997, for its main company website.\r\n\r\nThe disputed domain name <grouponet.com> points to a parking page which displays commercial (advertising) links. The Complainant contends the Respondent has attempt to attract Internet users for commercial gain to this website thanks to the Complainant’s trademarks for its own commercial gain, which the Complainant regards as evidence of bad faith.\r\n\r\nThe Complainant asserts that the Respondent is not identified in the Whois database with a name that is identical or similar to the disputed domain name, but as “Superstack Domain”. The Complainant contends that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name and he is not related in any way with the Complainant. The Complainant does not carry out any activity for, nor has any business with the Respondent. The Complainant has granted neither license nor authorization to the Respondent to make any use of the Complainant’s trademark “ONET”, or apply for registration of the disputed domain name.",
    "other_legal_proceedings": "The Panel is not aware of any other legal proceedings which are pending or decided and which relate to the disputed domain name.",
    "no_response_filed": "NO ADMINISTRATIVELY COMPLIANT RESPONSE HAS BEEN FILED.",
    "rights": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy).",
    "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy).",
    "bad_faith": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy).",
    "procedural_factors": "The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.",
    "decision": "Accepted",
    "panelists": [
        "Dr. Thomas Schafft"
    ],
    "date_of_panel_decision": "2022-05-05 00:00:00",
    "informal_english_translation": "The Complainant is the owner of several \"ONET\" trademarks, including the international trademark registration no. 1047179 “ONET” (word), registered since October 24th, 2008, for numerous goods and services in classes 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 11, 12, 16, 18, 19, 20, 21, 25, 27, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, and 45.\r\n\r\nThe disputed domain name was registered in January 26th, 2015, i.e. the Complainant’s trademark clearly predates the registration of the disputed domain name.",
    "decision_domains": {
        "GROUPONET.COM": "TRANSFERRED"
    },
    "panelist": null,
    "panellists_text": null
}