{ "case_number": "CAC-UDRP-104462", "time_of_filling": "2022-04-01 09:53:40", "domain_names": [ "BANCA-INTESA-SICUREZZA.COM" ], "case_administrator": " Iveta Špiclová (Czech Arbitration Court) (Case admin)", "complainant": [ "Intesa Sanpaolo S.p.A." ], "complainant_representative": "Intesa Sanpaolo S.p.A.", "respondent": [ "Host Master \/ 1337 Services LLC" ], "respondent_representative": null, "factual_background": "FACTS ASSERTED BY THE COMPLAINANT AND NOT CONTESTED BY THE RESPONDENT:\r\n\r\nThe Complainant claims to be the leading Italian banking group and one of the protagonists in the European financial arena. The Complainant is the company resulting from the merger (effective as of January 1, 2007) between Banca Intesa S.p.A. and Sanpaolo IMI S.p.A., two of the top Italian banking groups.\r\n\r\nThe Complainant claims to be among the top banking groups in the euro zone, with a market capitalisation exceeding 44,6 billion euro, and the undisputed leader in Italy, in all business areas (retail, corporate and wealth management). Thanks to a network of approximately 3,700 branches capillary and well distributed throughout the country, with market shares of more than 17 % in most Italian regions, the Complainant and its related group companies offer services to approximately 13,5 million customers. The Complainant further claims to have a strong presence in Central-Eastern Europe with a network of approximately 1.000 branches and over 7,1 million customers. Moreover, the Complainant asserts that its international network specialised in supporting corporate customers is present in 25 countries, in particular in the Mediterranean area and those areas where Italian companies are most active, such as the United States, Russia, China and India. \r\n\r\nFurthermore, the Complainant claims to be the owner of the following domain names which contain the signs “intesa sanpaolo”, “intesa” and “banca intesa sanpaolo”: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , < ntesa.cn>, , , , , , , , , , , , , and . According to the Complainant, all these domain names link to its official website http:\/\/www.intesasanpaolo.com. No evidence was submitted about the ownership of these domain names. \r\n\r\nThe Complainant submitted evidence that it is the registered owner of the trademarks mentioned above under \"Identification of rights\". \r\n\r\nThe disputed domain name was registered on May 26, 2021. \r\n\r\n\r\nThe website available via the disputed domain name displays the following message in Italian:\r\n\r\n“Sito ingannevole in vista\r\nGli utenti malintenzionati presenti sul sito banca-intesa- sicurezza.com potrebbero indurti con l'inganno a effettuare operazioni pericolose, come installare software o rivelare informazioni personali (ad esempio password, numeri di telefono o carte di credito). Ulteriori informazioni.\r\n\r\nPer il massimo livello di sicurezza di Chrome, attiva la protezione avanzata”\r\n\r\n\r\nThis message can be translated in English as follows:\r\n\r\n“Misleading site detected \r\n\r\nCyber criminals on the website banca-intesa-sicurezza.com may try to trick you into doing something dangerous, such as installing software or revealing your personal information (such as passwords, phone numbers, or credit card details). More information\r\n\r\nFor Chrome's highest level of security, turn on the advanced protection”\r\n\r\n\r\nThis seems to be a security warning by Google (via the Google Chrome browser).", "other_legal_proceedings": "The Panel is not aware of any other legal proceedings which are pending or decided and which relate to the disputed domain name.", "no_response_filed": "NO ADMINISTRATIVELY COMPLIANT RESPONSE HAS BEEN FILED.\r\n", "rights": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy).", "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy).", "bad_faith": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy).", "procedural_factors": "The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.", "decision": "Accepted", "panelists": [ "Bart Van Besien" ], "date_of_panel_decision": "2022-05-18 00:00:00", "informal_english_translation": "The Complainant submitted evidence that it is the owner of the following trademarks “INTESA SANPAOLO”, “INTESA” and “BANCA INTESA SANPAOLO” (hereafter the “Trademarks”):\r\n\r\n- International trademark registration n. 920896 “INTESA SANPAOLO” (word trademark), registered on March 7, 2007 and duly renewed, valid for classes 9, 16, 35, 36, 41 and 42;\r\n\r\n- EU trademark registration n. 5301999 “INTESA SANPAOLO” (word trademark), registered on June 18, 2007 and duly renewed, valid for classes 35, 36 and 38;\r\n\r\n- International trademark registration n. 793367 “INTESA” (word trademark), registered on September 4, 2002 and duly renewed, valid for class 36;\r\n\r\n- EU trademark registration n. 12247979 “INTESA” (word trademark), registered on March 5, 2014, valid for classes 9, 16, 35, 36 38, 41 and 42;\r\n\r\n- EU trademark registration n. 5302377 “BANCA INTESA SANPAOLO” (word trademark), registered on July 6, 2007 and duly renewed, valid for classes 35, 36 and 38.\r\n", "decision_domains": { "BANCA-INTESA-SICUREZZA.COM": "TRANSFERRED" }, "panelist": null, "panellists_text": null }