{
    "case_number": "CAC-UDRP-104576",
    "time_of_filling": "2022-05-13 09:59:14",
    "domain_names": [
        "schneiderelectricservice.com"
    ],
    "case_administrator": "  Iveta Špiclová   (Czech Arbitration Court) (Case admin)",
    "complainant": [
        "SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC SE"
    ],
    "complainant_representative": "NAMESHIELD S.A.S.",
    "respondent": [
        "MICHAEL  BEIGH"
    ],
    "respondent_representative": null,
    "factual_background": "FACTS ASSERTED BY THE COMPLAINANT AND NOT CONTESTED BY THE RESPONDENT:\r\n\r\nThe Complainant is a French industrial company trading internationally, founded in 1871. It manufactures and offers products for power management, automation, and related solutions.\r\n\r\nThe Complainant is featured on the NYSE Euronext and the French CAC 40 stock market index. In 2019, the Complainant revenues amounted to 27.2 billion euros.\r\n\r\nThe disputed domain name <schneiderelectricservice.com> was registered by the Respondent on May 2, 2022, using a Privacy service. The website under this domain name is inactive but MX servers are enabled. The Respondent has not published any visible disclaimer on the website linked to the disputed domain name to explain that there is no existing relationship between the Respondent and the Complainant.   \r\n\r\n",
    "other_legal_proceedings": "The Panel is not aware of any other legal proceedings which are pending or decided and which relate to the disputed domain name.",
    "no_response_filed": "NO ADMINISTRATIVELY COMPLIANT RESPONSE HAS BEEN FILED.\r\n",
    "rights": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy).",
    "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy).",
    "bad_faith": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy).",
    "procedural_factors": "The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.",
    "decision": "Accepted",
    "panelists": [
        "Dr. jur. Harald von Herget"
    ],
    "date_of_panel_decision": "2022-06-13 00:00:00",
    "informal_english_translation": "The Complainant is owner of several trademarks including the word parts “SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC”, such as the international word figurative trademark SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC, n° 715395 registered since March 15, 1999 and the European trademark SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC, n° 1103803 registered since March 12, 1999. Both trademarks are valid.",
    "decision_domains": {
        "SCHNEIDERELECTRICSERVICE.COM": "TRANSFERRED"
    },
    "panelist": null,
    "panellists_text": null
}