{
    "case_number": "CAC-UDRP-104602",
    "time_of_filling": "2022-05-23 09:04:26",
    "domain_names": [
        "hellobank.online"
    ],
    "case_administrator": "  Iveta Špiclová   (Czech Arbitration Court) (Case admin)",
    "complainant": [
        "BNP PARIBAS"
    ],
    "complainant_representative": "NAMESHIELD S.A.S.",
    "respondent": [
        "TaS Box"
    ],
    "respondent_representative": null,
    "factual_background": "FACTS ASSERTED BY THE COMPLAINANT AND NOT CONTESTED BY THE RESPONDENT:\r\n \r\nThe Complainant is an international banking group with a presence in 68 countries, and is one of the largest banks in the world. It has nearly 190,000 employees and EUR 46.2 billion in revenue.\r\n \r\nHELLO BANK! is the mobile banking brand of BNP PARIBAS FORTIS, one of the Complainant’s subsidiaries. \r\n \r\nThe Complainant is the owner of the HELLO BANK registered trademark. The Complainant is also the owner of multiple domain names bearing this mark, including for example, <hellobank.com> registered since December 7, 2005.\r\n \r\nThe Respondent registered the disputed domain name on March 23, 2022. It resolves to a parking page.\r\n \r\nThe disputed domain name is identical to the Complainant’s HELLO BANK trademark and contains this in its entirety, without any addition or deletion. The addition of the gTLD “.online” does not change the overall impression of connection to the Complainant’s trademark and does not prevent the likelihood of confusion between the disputed domain name and the Complainant, its trademark and its associated domain names.\r\n \r\nThe Respondent does not have any rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain name. The Respondent is not known as the disputed domain name in the Whois database and has not acquired corresponding trademark rights. Past panels have held that a Respondent was not commonly known by a disputed domain name if the Whois information was not similar to the disputed domain name. The Respondent is not related in any way to the Complainant’s business, and the Complainant does not carry out any activity for, nor has any business with the Respondent. The Respondent is not affiliated with the Complainant, nor authorized by it in any way to use its HELLO BANK trademark.\r\n \r\nThe disputed domain name resolves to a parking page, indicating that the Respondent has not used the disputed domain name and has no demonstrable plan to use it.\r\n \r\nThe Respondent has registered and is using the disputed domain name in bad faith. The Respondent registered the disputed domain name several years after the registration of the Complainant's trademark, which has established a strong reputation. The Complainant contends that the term “HELLO BANK” does not have any significance, except in relation to the Complainant. Given the distinctiveness of the Complainant's trademark and reputation, it is inconceivable that the Respondent could have registered the disputed domain name without actual knowledge of the Complainant's rights in the trademark, thus evidencing bad faith.  ",
    "other_legal_proceedings": "The Panel is not aware of any other legal proceedings which are pending or decided and which relate to the disputed domain name.",
    "no_response_filed": "NO ADMINISTRATIVELY COMPLIANT RESPONSE HAS BEEN FILED.",
    "rights": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy).",
    "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy).",
    "bad_faith": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy).",
    "procedural_factors": "The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.",
    "decision": "Accepted",
    "panelists": [
        "Andrew Lothian"
    ],
    "date_of_panel_decision": "2022-06-16 00:00:00",
    "informal_english_translation": "The Complainant is the owner of several registered trademarks in respect of the mark HELLO BANK including for example:\r\n \r\n- International Registered Trademark no. 1157012 for the word mark HELLO BANK, registered on February 27, 2013 in Class 36, and designated in respect of 10 territories; and \r\n \r\n- European Union Registered Trademark no. 14266779 for the word mark HELLO BANK, registered on February 18, 2017 in Class 36.  ",
    "decision_domains": {
        "HELLOBANK.ONLINE": "TRANSFERRED"
    },
    "panelist": null,
    "panellists_text": null
}