{
    "case_number": "CAC-UDRP-104590",
    "time_of_filling": "2022-05-17 09:29:53",
    "domain_names": [
        "boll0rre.com"
    ],
    "case_administrator": "Denisa Bilík (CAC) (Case admin)",
    "complainant": [
        "BOLLORE SE"
    ],
    "complainant_representative": "NAMESHIELD S.A.S.",
    "respondent": [
        "shem gitahi"
    ],
    "respondent_representative": null,
    "factual_background": "The Complainant, BOLLORÉ SE, is part of a group founded in 1822 and listed on the Paris Stock Exchange. The Complainant is active around three business lines: Transportation and Logistics, Communication and Media, Electricity Storage and solutions. In addition to its activities, the Complainant’s group manages a number of financial assets including plantations and financial investments.\r\n\r\nThe Complainant is the owner of a figurative mark including the term “BOLLORÉ” registered in several classes in numerous countries worldwide. The Complainant also owns and communicates on the Internet through various domain names, the main one being <bollore.com>, registered on July 24, 1997.\r\n\r\nThe disputed domain name <boll0rre.com> was registered on May 10, 2022. According to the evidence provided by the Complainant, the disputed domain name resolved to a parking page including an image mentioning “COMING SOON”. The Panel observes that the disputed domain name now resolves to a parking page, including sponsored links depending on the browser used.",
    "other_legal_proceedings": "The Panel is not aware of any other legal proceedings which are pending or decided and which relate to the disputed domain name.",
    "no_response_filed": "NO ADMINISTRATIVELY COMPLIANT RESPONSE HAS BEEN FILED.\r\n\r\nPARTIES' CONTENTIONS:\r\n\r\nCOMPLAINANT: The Complainant considers the disputed domain name confusingly similar to a trademark in which it has rights. The Complainant claims that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name. According to the Complainant, the Respondent is not known by the disputed domain name and is not related to the Complainant. Also, according to the Complainant, the disputed domain name is a typosquatted version of the Complainant’s mark which can be evidence that the Respondent lacks rights and legitimate interests in the disputed domain name. The Complainant also claims that the Respondent does not use the disputed domain name in connection with any legitimate use. Finally, the Complainant considers that the disputed domain name was registered and is being used in bad faith. The Complainant contends that the Respondent must have known of the existence of the Complainant’s trademark given its distinctiveness and well-known character. The Complainant further claims that the misspelling of the Complainant’s trademark is evidence of bad faith. According to the Complainant, the Respondent has not demonstrated any activity in respect of the disputed domain name, and it is not possible to conceive of any plausible actual or contemplated active use of the disputed domain name by the Respondent that would not be illegitimate.   \r\n\r\nRESPONDENT: The Respondent did not reply to the Complainants’ contentions.",
    "rights": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy).",
    "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy).",
    "bad_faith": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy).",
    "procedural_factors": "The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.",
    "decision": "Accepted",
    "panelists": [
        "Flip Petillion"
    ],
    "date_of_panel_decision": "2022-06-24 00:00:00",
    "informal_english_translation": "The Complainant invokes an international figurative mark including the term “BOLLORÉ” registered under n° 704697 on December 11, 1998 in classes 16, 17, 34, 35, 36, 38 and 39.",
    "decision_domains": {
        "BOLL0RRE.COM": "TRANSFERRED"
    },
    "panelist": null,
    "panellists_text": null
}