{
    "case_number": "CAC-UDRP-104639",
    "time_of_filling": "2022-06-09 09:01:16",
    "domain_names": [
        "arcelormittalblog.com"
    ],
    "case_administrator": "  Iveta Špiclová   (Czech Arbitration Court) (Case admin)",
    "complainant": [
        "ARCELORMITTAL (SA)"
    ],
    "complainant_representative": "NAMESHIELD S.A.S.",
    "respondent": [
        "Fastloc Inc"
    ],
    "respondent_representative": null,
    "factual_background": "The Complainant is the largest steel producing company in the world and is the market leader in steel for use in automotive, construction, household appliances and packaging. It holds sizeable captive supplies of raw materials and operates extensive distribution networks.\r\n\r\nThe disputed domain name was registered with privacy or proxy service on 30 May 2022, well after the registration of the Complainant's ARCELORMITTAL Trademark, by bill chill, Fastloc Inc, located in Newline 21, New York, Alba, 764554, Romania.\r\n\r\nThe disputed domain name resolves to a parking page. MX records have also been set for the disputed domain name.\r\n\r\nThe facts asserted by the Complainant are not contested by the Respondent.",
    "other_legal_proceedings": "The Panel is not aware of any other legal proceedings which are pending or decided and which relate to the disputed domain name.",
    "no_response_filed": "PARTIES' CONTENTIONS:\r\n\r\nCOMPLAINANT:\r\n\r\nThe Complainant contends that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to its trademark, since it incorporates in its entirety the Complainant’s registered and well-known ARCELORMITTAL Trademark. The mere addition of a generic and descriptive term (i.e. the term 'BLOG') does not prevent a finding of confusing similarity to the Complainant's trademark.\r\n\r\nThe Complainant contends that the Respondent has nothing to do with the Complainant, nor has been licensed or authorised to register or use the disputed domain name. The disputed domain name does not correspond to the Respondent's name, nor is this latter commonly known by the disputed domain name or owns any corresponding registered trademarks.\r\n\r\nFinally, the Complainant contends that, given the distinctiveness and reputation of the ARCELORMITTAL Trademark, it is unlikely that the Respondent had no knowledge of the Complainant's mark when he had registered the disputed domain name confusingly similar to such mark. To the contrary, the Respondent has already been involved in UDRP cases against the Complainant. Moreover, considered that MX servers are set for the disputed domain name, it is inconceivable that the Respondent makes any good faith use of the disputed domain name as part of an e-mail address.\r\n\r\nThe Complainant, therefore, requests the transfer of the disputed domain name.\r\n\r\nRESPONDENT:\r\n\r\nNo administratively compliant Response has been filed.",
    "rights": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy).",
    "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy).",
    "bad_faith": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy).",
    "procedural_factors": "The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.",
    "decision": "Accepted",
    "panelists": [
        "Avv. Ivett Paulovics"
    ],
    "date_of_panel_decision": "2022-07-03 00:00:00",
    "informal_english_translation": "The Complainant is the owner of the international trademark 'ARCELORMITTAL' no. 947686, registered since 3 August 2007 in classes 6, 7, 9, 12, 19, 21, 39, 40, 41, 42.\r\n\r\nIt also owns multiple domain names, among which <arcelormittal.com>, registered since 27 January 2006 and used as its main website.\r\n\r\nFinally, the Complainant conducts its business under the company \/ trade name ARCELORMITTAL (SA).\r\n\r\nThe Complainant’s above-mentioned rights are hereinafter collectively referred to as the ARCELORMITTAL Trademark.",
    "decision_domains": {
        "ARCELORMITTALBLOG.COM": "TRANSFERRED"
    },
    "panelist": null,
    "panellists_text": null
}