{
    "case_number": "CAC-UDRP-104857",
    "time_of_filling": "2022-09-20 09:57:26",
    "domain_names": [
        "bourseama.com"
    ],
    "case_administrator": "  Iveta Špiclová   (Czech Arbitration Court) (Case admin)",
    "complainant": [
        "BOURSORAMA SA"
    ],
    "complainant_representative": "NAMESHIELD S.A.S.",
    "respondent": [
        "Carolina Rodrigues (Fundacion Comercio Electronico)"
    ],
    "respondent_representative": null,
    "factual_background": "<p>The Complainant was founded in 1995. It is active in online brokerage, financial information on the Internet and online banking. In France, the Complainant has over 4 million customers.<\/p>\n<p>The Complainant owns the domain name &lt;boursorama.com&gt;, registered on 1 March 1998, which resolves to the website at <a href=\"http:\/\/www.boursorama.com\">www.boursorama.com<\/a>, a French national financial and economic information website and online banking platform.<\/p>\n<p>The disputed domain name was registered on 13 September 2022, and resolves to a parking webpage with commercial links.<\/p>",
    "other_legal_proceedings": "<p>The Panel is not aware of any other legal proceedings which are pending or decided and which relate to the disputed domain name.<\/p>",
    "no_response_filed": "<p>PARTIES' CONTENTIONS:<\/p>\n<p>COMPLAINANT:<\/p>\n<p>The Complainant states that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to its BOURSORAMA trademark. According to the Complainant, the substitution of the letters &ldquo;or&rdquo; by the letter &ldquo;e&rdquo; in the disputed domain name is not sufficient to preclude the finding that it is confusingly similar to the Complainant&rsquo;s trademark, but represents a case of &ldquo;typosquatting&rdquo;, where the disputed domain name contains an obvious misspelling of the Complainant&rsquo;s BOURSORAMA trademark.<\/p>\n<p>The Complainant contends that Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name, because it is not commonly known by the disputed domain name and is not affiliated with or authorized by the Complainant to use the Complainant&rsquo;s BOURSORAMA trademark or to apply for registration of the disputed domain name. The Complainant points out that the disputed domain name resolves to a parking webpage with commercial links, which according to it is not a bona fide offering of goods or services or legitimate non-commercial or fair use.<\/p>\n<p>The Complainant contends that the Respondent has registered and used the disputed domain name with knowledge of the Complainant&rsquo;s well-known BOURSORAMA trademark, because the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to it. The misspelling of this trademark in the disputed domain name was intentionally designed to make it confusingly similar with the trademark. The disputed domain name resolves to a parking webpage with commercial links, which according to the Complainant shows that the Respondent attempts to attract Internet users for commercial gain to its own website using the popularity of the Complainant&rsquo;s trademark.<\/p>\n<p>RESPONDENT:<\/p>\n<p>The Respondent did not submit a Response in this proceeding.<\/p>",
    "rights": "<p>The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy).<\/p>",
    "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "<p>The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy).<\/p>",
    "bad_faith": "<p>The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy).<\/p>",
    "procedural_factors": "<p>The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.<\/p>",
    "decision": "Accepted",
    "panelists": [
        "Assen Alexiev"
    ],
    "date_of_panel_decision": "2022-10-27 00:00:00",
    "informal_english_translation": "<p>The Complainant is the owner of the European Union trademark BOURSORAMA with registration No.1758614, registered on 19 October 2001 for goods and services in International Classes 9, 16, 35, 36, 38, 41 and 42 (the &ldquo;BOURSORAMA trademark&rdquo;).<\/p>",
    "decision_domains": {
        "bourseama.com": "TRANSFERRED"
    },
    "panelist": null,
    "panellists_text": null
}