{
    "case_number": "CAC-UDRP-102833",
    "time_of_filling": "2019-12-30 14:11:25",
    "domain_names": [
        "clients-boursorama.work"
    ],
    "case_administrator": "Šárka Glasslová (Case admin)",
    "complainant": [
        "BOURSORAMA SA"
    ],
    "complainant_representative": "Nameshield (Enora Millocheau)",
    "respondent": [
        "Julio Jaime"
    ],
    "respondent_representative": null,
    "factual_background": "FACTS ASSERTED BY THE COMPLAINANT AND NOT CONTESTED BY THE RESPONDENT:\r\n\r\nFounded in 1995, Boursorama, the Complainant, is one of the very first online financial platforms in Europe. One of the earliest of the emerging e-commerce providers, it enjoyed substantial growth due to its continuous expansion and grew into a pioneer and market leader in its three core businesses: online brokerage, financial information on the Internet and online banking. Today in France, Boursorama is the leading online banking provider.\r\n\r\nThe Complainant notes that the disputed domain name was registered on December 16, 2019.\r\n\r\nThe Complainant assumes that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to its registered trademark \"BOURSORAMA\" as the disputed domain name contains the Complainant's trademark in its entirety. The addition of a hyphen and of the generic term \"clients\" does not alter the finding of similarity between the signs. \r\n\r\nFurthermore, according with the Complainant's statement, the Respondent lacks rights or legitimate interest in the domain name in dispute since the Respondent is not affiliated with it nor authorized by it in any way and the Complainant does not carry out any activity for, nor has any business with, the Respondent. In addition, according to the Whois information connected to <clients-boursorama.work>, the Respondent is not commonly known with the terms Boursorama or clients-boursorama.\r\n\r\nThe Complainant also contends that the website in relation with the domain name in dispute only displays an inactive page since its registration and that the incorporation of a famous mark into a domain name coupled with an inactive website may be evidence of bad faith registration and use.\r\n\r\n",
    "other_legal_proceedings": "The Panel is not aware of any other proceedings, pending or decided, which relate to the disputed domain name.",
    "no_response_filed": "NO ADMINISTRATIVELY COMPLIANT RESPONSE HAS BEEN FILED.\r\n\r\n",
    "rights": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy).",
    "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy).",
    "bad_faith": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy).",
    "procedural_factors": "The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.",
    "decision": "Accepted",
    "panelists": [
        "Avv. Guido Maffei"
    ],
    "date_of_panel_decision": "2020-02-20 00:00:00",
    "informal_english_translation": "The Complainant is the owner of a large portfolio of trademarks. In particular, BOURSORAMA SA owns the EU Registration No. 1758614 \"BOURSORAMA\" registered on October 19, 2001 (and duly renewed) for classes 9, 16, 35, 36, 38, 41 and 42.",
    "decision_domains": {
        "CLIENTS-BOURSORAMA.WORK": "TRANSFERRED"
    },
    "panelist": null,
    "panellists_text": null
}