{
    "case_number": "CAC-UDRP-104877",
    "time_of_filling": "2022-09-30 13:49:49",
    "domain_names": [
        "isabel-marantus.com"
    ],
    "case_administrator": "  Iveta Špiclová   (Czech Arbitration Court) (Case admin)",
    "complainant": [
        "IM PRODUCTION"
    ],
    "complainant_representative": "NAMESHIELD S.A.S.",
    "respondent": [
        "Xue Han"
    ],
    "respondent_representative": null,
    "factual_background": "<p>The Complainant is a French company specializing in the manufacture and marketing of ready-to-wear, shoes, handbags and jewellery. &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>The Complainant is the owner of several word marks for ISABEL MARANT, registered in several classes and covering various countries, including in China where the Respondent is located. The Complainant also owns the domain name &lt;isabelmarant.com&gt;, which resolves to the Complainant&rsquo;s official website.<\/p>\n<p>The disputed domain name &lt;isabel-marantus.com&gt; has been registered on September 16, 2022 by the Respondent. According to evidence provided by the Complainant, the disputed domain name resolved to a website purporting to be an online store selling clothing products at discounted prices. <span>The disputed domain name currently resolves to a blocked page.<\/span><\/p>",
    "other_legal_proceedings": "<p>The Panel is not aware of any other legal proceedings which are pending or decided and which relate to the disputed domain name.<\/p>",
    "no_response_filed": "<p>NO ADMINISTRATIVELY COMPLIANT RESPONSE HAS BEEN FILED.<\/p>\n<p>PARTIES' CONTENTIONS:<\/p>\n<p>COMPLAINANT:<\/p>\n<p>The Complainant considers the disputed domain name to be confusingly similar to trademarks in which it has rights. The Complainant claims that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name. According to the Complainant, the Respondent&rsquo;s name does not correspond to the disputed domain name and thus not commonly known by the disputed domain name. Also, according to the Complainant, the Respondent has not been authorized to use the Complainant&rsquo;s trademark and is not related in any way with the Complainant. The Complainant finds that the use of the disputed domain name demonstrates neither a bona fide offering of goods nor a legitimate interest of the Respondent. Finally, the Complainant considers that the disputed domain name was registered and is being used in bad faith. The Complainant contends that given the distinctiveness of the Complainant's trademark and its reputation, it is reasonable to infer that the Respondent has registered and used the disputed domain name with full knowledge of the Complainant's trademark. According to the Complainant, the Respondent registered and uses the domain name in bad faith to create confusion with the Complainant&rsquo;s trademarks for commercial gain by using the confusingly similar disputed domain name to resolve to a website offering counterfeit or unauthorized versions of the Complainant&rsquo;s products in direct competition with the Complainant&rsquo;s products.<\/p>\n<p>RESPONDENT:<\/p>\n<p>The Respondent did not reply to the Complainant&rsquo;s contentions.<\/p>",
    "rights": "<p>The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy).<\/p>",
    "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "<p>The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy).<\/p>",
    "bad_faith": "<p>The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy).<\/p>",
    "procedural_factors": "<p>The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.<\/p>",
    "decision": "Accepted",
    "panelists": [
        "Flip Petillion"
    ],
    "date_of_panel_decision": "2022-11-03 00:00:00",
    "informal_english_translation": "<p>The Complainant is the holder of various trademarks including the following:<\/p>\n<p>- ISABEL MARANT, International trademark registration No. 1284453 registered on November 16, 2015 in classes 4, 8, 11, 16, 20, 27 and 28;<br \/>- ISABEL MARANT, EU trademark registration No. 001035534 registered on May 3, 2000 in classes 3, 14 and 25.<\/p>",
    "decision_domains": {
        "isabel-marantus.com": "TRANSFERRED"
    },
    "panelist": null,
    "panellists_text": null
}