{
    "case_number": "CAC-UDRP-104884",
    "time_of_filling": "2022-09-30 13:48:17",
    "domain_names": [
        "INTESANPAOLOO.COM"
    ],
    "case_administrator": "  Iveta Špiclová   (Czech Arbitration Court) (Case admin)",
    "complainant": [
        "Intesa Sanpaolo S.p.A."
    ],
    "complainant_representative": "Intesa Sanpaolo S.p.A.",
    "respondent": [
        "ahmed kinnek"
    ],
    "respondent_representative": null,
    "factual_background": "<p>FACTS ASSERTED BY THE COMPLAINANT AND NOT CONTESTED BY THE RESPONDENT:<br \/><br \/>According to the Complainant, it is the leading Italian banking group and also one of the protagonists in the European financial arena. Intesa Sanpaolo is the company resulting from the merger (effective as of January 1, 2007) between Banca Intesa S.p.A. and Sanpaolo IMI S.p.A., two of the top Italian banking groups.<br \/><br \/>Intesa Sanpaolo is among the top banking groups in the Euro zone, with a market capitalization exceeding 47,7 billion Euro, and the undisputed leader in Italy, in all business areas (retail, corporate and wealth management). Thanks to a network of approximately 4,300 branches well distributed throughout the Country, with market shares of more than 19% in most Italian regions, the Group offers its services to approximately 13,5 million customers. Intesa Sanpaolo has a strong presence in Central-Eastern Europe with a network of approximately 1.000 branches and over 7,2 million customers. Moreover, the international network specialized in supporting corporate customers is present in 25 countries, in particular in the Mediterranean area and those areas where Italian companies are most active, such as the United States, Russia, China and India.<br \/><br \/><\/p>\n<p>On May 9, 2022 the Respondent registered the domain name &lt;INTESANPAOLOO.COM&gt;.<\/p>",
    "other_legal_proceedings": "<p>The Panel is not aware of any other legal proceedings which are pending or decided and which relate to the disputed domain name.<\/p>",
    "no_response_filed": "<p>No administratively compliant Response has been filed.<\/p>",
    "rights": "<p>The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy).<\/p>",
    "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "<p>The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy).<\/p>",
    "bad_faith": "<p>The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy).<\/p>",
    "procedural_factors": "<p>Language of the proceedings<br \/><br \/>According to the information provided by the Registrar, the language of the Registration Agreement is German. Under paragraph 11 of the Rules, unless otherwise agreed by the Parties, or specified otherwise in the Registration Agreement, the language of the administrative proceeding shall be the language of the Registration Agreement, subject to the authority of the Panel to determine otherwise, having regard to the circumstances of the administrative proceeding.<br \/><br \/>The Complainant requests the language of this administrative proceeding to be English, submitting that this is a universally known and used language. The Respondent has not objected to the Complainant&rsquo;s request concerning the language of the proceedings.<\/p>\n<p>Neither of the Parties has brought forward any arguments that using the English language in this proceeding would not be fair and efficient. The Complainant proposed accepting a German response to the Complaint and appointing a Panel familiar with both the English and German languages.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\">In the decision in Groupe Auchan v. xmxzl, WIPO Case No. DCC2006 0004, the Panel ruled as follows: &ldquo;Thus, the general rule is that the parties may agree on the language of the administrative proceeding. In the absence of this agreement, the language of the Registration Agreement shall dictate the language of the proceeding. However, the Panel has the discretion to decide otherwise having regard to the circumstances of the case. The Panel&rsquo;s discretion must be exercised judicially in the spirit of fairness and justice to both parties taking into consideration matters such as command of the language, time and costs. It is important that the language finally decided by the Panel for the proceeding is not prejudicial to either one of the parties in his or her abilities to articulate the arguments for the case.&rdquo; <br \/><br \/>Taking these considerations into account and keeping in mind that the Panel in this case is sufficiently familiar with both English and German to draft and issue decisions in both languages, the Panel, exercising its powers under paragraph 11 of the Rules, decides that the language of these administrative proceedings will be English. At the same time, the Panel will consider any evidence in the case file that is in the German language.<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p>The Panel is therefore satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.<\/p>",
    "decision": "Accepted",
    "panelists": [
        "Udo Pfleghar B.A. (Melb.)"
    ],
    "date_of_panel_decision": "2022-11-08 00:00:00",
    "informal_english_translation": "<p>The Complainant is the owner, among others, of the following registrations for the trademarks &ldquo;INTESA SANPAOLO&rdquo; and &ldquo;INTESA&rdquo;:<br \/><br \/>- International trademark registration n. 920896 &ldquo;INTESA SANPAOLO&rdquo;, granted on March 7, 2007 and duly renewed, in classes 9, 16, 35, 36, 38, 41 and 42;<br \/><br \/>- International trademark registration n. 793367 &ldquo;INTESA&rdquo;, granted on September 4, 2002 and duly renewed, in connection with class 36;<br \/><br \/>- EU trademark registration n. 5301999 &ldquo;INTESA SANPAOLO&rdquo;, applied on September 8, 2006 and granted on June 18, 2007, in classes 35, 36 and 38;<br \/><br \/>- EU trademark registration n. 12247979 &ldquo;INTESA&rdquo;, filed on October 23, 2013 and granted on March 5, 2014, in connection with classes 9, 16, 35, 36 38, 41 and 42.<br \/><br \/>Moreover, the Complainant is also the owner, among the others, of the following domain names bearing the signs &ldquo;INTESA SANPAOLO&rdquo; and &ldquo;INTESA&rdquo;: INTESASANPAOLO.COM, .ORG, .EU, .INFO, .NET, .BIZ, INTESA-SANPAOLO.COM, .ORG, .EU, .INFO, .NET, .BIZ and INTESA.COM, INTESA.INFO, INTESA.BIZ, INTESA.ORG, INTESA.US, INTESA.EU, INTESA.CN, INTESA.IN, INTESA.CO.UK, INTESA.TEL, INTESA.NAME, INTESA.XXX, INTESA.ME. All of them are now connected to the official website&nbsp;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.intesasanpaolo.com.\/\">http:\/\/www.intesasanpaolo.com.<\/a><\/p>",
    "decision_domains": {
        "INTESANPAOLOO.COM": "TRANSFERRED"
    },
    "panelist": null,
    "panellists_text": null
}