{
    "case_number": "CAC-UDRP-104944",
    "time_of_filling": "2022-10-24 09:43:09",
    "domain_names": [
        "clientboursorama.info",
        "clientborsorama.info"
    ],
    "case_administrator": "  Iveta Špiclová   (Czech Arbitration Court) (Case admin)",
    "complainant": [
        "BOURSORAMA SA"
    ],
    "complainant_representative": "NAMESHIELD S.A.S.",
    "respondent": [
        "Pierre Perrin"
    ],
    "respondent_representative": null,
    "factual_background": "<p>The disputed domain names were registered on October 18, 2022, and resolve only to the registrar's parking page. However, the domain name &lt;clientboursorama.info&gt; has been set up with MX servers, indicating an intent to send e-mails from such domain name. Also, these domain names appear to mimic the URL for Complainant&rsquo;s official customer access portal at <a href=\"http:\/\/www.clients.boursorama.com\">www.clients.boursorama.com<\/a>.<\/p>",
    "other_legal_proceedings": "<p>The Panel is not aware of any other legal proceedings which are pending or decided and which relate to the disputed domain names.<\/p>",
    "no_response_filed": "<p>The Complainant states that the disputed domain names are confusingly similar to its trademark BOURSORAMA&reg; and its domain names associated.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>The Complainant asserts that the Respondent is not identified in the Whois database as the disputed domain names. The Complainant contends that Respondent is not affiliated with nor authorized by the Complainant in any way. The Complainant contends that Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain names. The Complainant does not carry out any activity for, nor has any business with the Respondent. The Complainant provided evidence that the disputed domain names resolve to a parking page. The Complainant contends that Respondent did not make any use of disputed domain names since its registration, and it confirms that Respondent has no demonstrable plan to use the disputed domain names. It demonstrates a lack of legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain names.<\/p>\n<p>The Complainant derives use and registration of the disputed domain names when it contends that the Respondent has not demonstrated any activity in respect of the disputed domain names, and it is not possible to conceive of any plausible actual or contemplated active use of the domain names by the Respondent that would not be illegitimate, such as by being a passing off, an infringement of consumer protection legislation, or an infringement of the Complainant&rsquo;s rights under trademark law. As prior WIPO UDRP panels have held, the incorporation of a famous mark into a domain name, coupled with an inactive website, may be evidence of bad faith registration and use.<\/p>\n<p>The Complainant finally argues that MX servers are configured on the disputed domain name &lt;clientboursorama.info&gt; which suggests that the disputed domain name may be actively used for email purposes.<\/p>\n<p>No administratively compliant Response has been filed.&nbsp;<\/p>",
    "rights": "<p>The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain names are identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy).<\/p>",
    "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "<p>The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain names (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy).<\/p>",
    "bad_faith": "<p>The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain names have been registered and are being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy).<\/p>",
    "procedural_factors": "<p>The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.<\/p>",
    "decision": "Accepted",
    "panelists": [
        "Mike Rodenbaugh"
    ],
    "date_of_panel_decision": "2022-11-21 00:00:00",
    "informal_english_translation": "<p>The Complainant is the owner of the European trademark BOURSORAMA&reg; n&deg;001758614 registered since October 19, 2001 for a broad variety of financial services.<\/p>",
    "decision_domains": {
        "clientboursorama.info": "TRANSFERRED",
        "clientborsorama.info": "TRANSFERRED"
    },
    "panelist": null,
    "panellists_text": null
}