{
    "case_number": "CAC-UDRP-104706",
    "time_of_filling": "2022-07-18 09:10:01",
    "domain_names": [
        "matthias-arens.info"
    ],
    "case_administrator": "  Iveta Špiclová   (Czech Arbitration Court) (Case admin)",
    "complainant": [
        "Matthias Arens "
    ],
    "complainant_representative": "ITjur",
    "respondent": [
        "Jan Vanderpelen "
    ],
    "respondent_representative": null,
    "factual_background": "FACTS ASSERTED BY THE COMPLAINANT AND NOT CONTESTED BY THE RESPONDENT:\r\n\r\nThe Complainant is a German national resident in Switzerland.\r\n\r\nThe Respondent registered the disputed domain name on 28 October 2021.  \r\n\r\nThe Complainant adduced evidence supporting his allegation that, as at 28 July 2022, the website accessed through the disputed domain name contained content derogatory and disparaging of the Complainant and images copied from the Complainant's social media accounts and posts without his permission.  At the time of this decision, the website no longer contained any active content.  \r\n\r\n",
    "other_legal_proceedings": "The Panel is not aware of any other legal proceedings which are pending or decided and which relate to the disputed domain name.",
    "no_response_filed": "NO ADMINISTRATIVELY COMPLIANT RESPONSE HAS BEEN FILED.",
    "rights": "The Complainant has failed to show, to the satisfaction of the Panel, that the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy).",
    "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "The Complainant has failed to show, to the satisfaction of the Panel, that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy).",
    "bad_faith": "The Complainant has failed to show, to the satisfaction of the Panel, that the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy).",
    "procedural_factors": "The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.  \r\n\r\nBy nonstandard communication dated 23 August 2022, the Panel invited the Complainant inter alia to make further submissions, supported by sufficient explanations and evidence, in compliance in particular with paragraphs 3(b) (viii), (ix) and (xiv) of the UDRP Rules, to demonstrate that the Complainant enjoys rights that provide standing in these administrative proceedings and that the requirements for a revocation of the disputed domain name are satisfied.\r\n\r\nThe Complainant responded to the Panel's invitation by filing further submissions also on 23 August 2022.  ",
    "decision": "Rejected",
    "panelists": [
        "Gregor Kleinknecht, LLM MCIArb"
    ],
    "date_of_panel_decision": "2022-09-08 00:00:00",
    "informal_english_translation": "The Complainant seeks to rely on his personal civil name (as evidenced by a copy extract of his passport) as a right within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the UDRP Policy.  For the reasons given below, the Panel does not consider the Complainant's personal name to be a UDRP relevant right in the circumstances of the present administrative proceedings.  ",
    "decision_domains": {
        "MATTHIAS-ARENS.INFO": "REJECTED"
    },
    "panelist": null,
    "panellists_text": null
}