{
    "case_number": "CAC-UDRP-104781",
    "time_of_filling": "2022-08-09 10:03:54",
    "domain_names": [
        "biodermavn.com"
    ],
    "case_administrator": "Denisa Bilík (CAC) (Case admin)",
    "complainant": [
        "NAOS"
    ],
    "complainant_representative": "NAMESHIELD S.A.S.",
    "respondent": [
        "HHShop"
    ],
    "respondent_representative": null,
    "factual_background": "FACTS ASSERTED BY THE COMPLAINANT AND NOT CONTESTED BY THE RESPONDENT:\r\n\r\nThe Complainant (NAOS) claims to be a major player in skincare, ranked among the top 10 independent beauty companies in the world, with more than 3.100 employees located around the world through 48 subsidiaries and on-term partnerships with local distributors. The Complainant states that it owes its success due to three brands: “Bioderma”, “Institut Esthederm” and “Etat Pur”. \r\n\r\nThe Complainant declares it operates under the name “BIODERMA” to sell its branded products “BIODERMA” in over 130 countries around the globe. The Complainant states to own a large portfolio of registered “BIODERMA” trademarks (with reference to the “Trademarks” as mentioned above).\r\n\r\nThe Complainant also states that it is the owner of multiple domain names which include the word “BIODERMA”, for example the domain name <bioderma.com>, since September 25th, 1997.\r\n\r\nThe Complainant states that the disputed domain <biodermavn.com> was registered on August 2nd, 2022, and redirects to the website of a company allegedly named “BIODERMA VIETNAM”, allegedly selling products under the name “BIODERMA”. ",
    "other_legal_proceedings": "The Panel is not aware of any other legal proceedings which are pending or decided and which relate to the disputed domain name.",
    "no_response_filed": "NO ADMINISTRATIVELY COMPLIANT RESPONSE HAS BEEN FILED.",
    "rights": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy).",
    "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy).",
    "bad_faith": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy).",
    "procedural_factors": "The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.",
    "decision": "Accepted",
    "panelists": [
        "Bart Van Besien"
    ],
    "date_of_panel_decision": "2022-09-14 00:00:00",
    "informal_english_translation": "The Complainant submitted evidence that it is the owner of the following trademarks “BIODERMA” (hereafter the “Trademarks”):\r\n\r\n- International trademark “BIODERMA” (wordmark), no. 267207, registered on March 19th, 1963, valid for various countries, in international class 3 (for cosmetics);\r\n- International trademark “BIODERMA” (wordmark), no. 510524, registered on March 9th, 1987, valid for various countries, in international class 3 (for cosmetics); and\r\n- International trademark “BIODERMA” (wordmark), no. 678846, registered on August 13th, 1997, valid for various countries including Vietnam, in international class 3 (for cosmetics).",
    "decision_domains": {
        "BIODERMAVN.COM": "TRANSFERRED"
    },
    "panelist": null,
    "panellists_text": null
}