{
    "case_number": "CAC-UDRP-105154",
    "time_of_filling": "2023-02-22 15:17:07",
    "domain_names": [
        "droit-technologies.org"
    ],
    "case_administrator": "  Iveta Špiclová   (Czech Arbitration Court) (Case admin)",
    "complainant": [
        "Max & Zoe SRL"
    ],
    "complainant_representative": "Philippe Navez",
    "respondent": [
        "Mr Frederic Peters"
    ],
    "respondent_representative": null,
    "factual_background": "<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><span>The Complainant claims to be linked to the law firm Ulys and its founder, Mr. Etienne W&eacute;ry. Based on limited factual research, the Panel was able to verify that Mr. Etienne W&eacute;ry is the director of the Complainant. <\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><span>The Complainant is the holder of the domain name &lt;droit-technologie.org&gt;, registered since August 4, 1998 and resolving to a portal\/blog of articles and studies related to tech law, innovation and intellectual property. &nbsp;<\/span><\/p>\n<p>According to the Complainant&rsquo;s evidence, a person with a name corresponding to the Respondent&rsquo;s name has sent an e-mail to Mr. Etienne W&eacute;ry on December 1, 2017, announcing the registration of the disputed domain name.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><span>According to the information provided by the registrar, the disputed domain name &lt;droit-technologies.org&gt; has been registered on December 21, 2022, and appears to resolve to a blocked web page.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><span>The Complainant also provides a screenshot, dated January 17, 2023, of a LinkedIn post sent under a name corresponding to the Respondent&rsquo;s name. This post announces content to be posted on a blog linked to the disputed domain name and mentions the name of Mr. Etienne W&eacute;ry.<\/span><\/p>",
    "other_legal_proceedings": "<p>The Panel is not aware of any other legal proceedings which are pending or decided and which relate to the disputed domain name.<\/p>",
    "no_response_filed": "<p>Complainant&acute;s contentions are summarised above.<\/p>\n<p>NO ADMINISTRATIVELY COMPLIANT RESPONSE HAS BEEN FILED.&nbsp;<\/p>",
    "rights": "<p>The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy).<\/p>",
    "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "<p>The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy).<\/p>",
    "bad_faith": "<p>The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy).<\/p>",
    "procedural_factors": "<p>The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.<\/p>",
    "decision": "Accepted",
    "panelists": [
        "Flip Petillion"
    ],
    "date_of_panel_decision": "2023-04-06 00:00:00",
    "informal_english_translation": "<p>The Complainant claims to have unregistered trademark rights in the trade name &ldquo;Droit &amp; Technologies&rdquo; and the domain name &lt;droit-technologie.org&gt;.<\/p>",
    "decision_domains": {
        "droit-technologies.org": "TRANSFERRED"
    },
    "panelist": null,
    "panellists_text": null
}