FACTS ASSERTED BY THE COMPLAINANT AND NOT CONTESTED BY THE RESPONDENT:<\/p>\n
The Complainant is Europe's leading financial asset manager (by assets under management) with offices in Europe, Asia-Pacific, the Middle East, and the Americas. The Complainant has over 100 million retail, institutional and corporate clients globally.<\/p>\n
The disputed domain names both resolve to parking page websites with commercial advertising links that promote various financial services offered by third parties.<\/p>\n
The Complainant further contends that the Respondent is neither affiliated with nor authorized by the Complainant in any way. The Complainant also contends that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain names. The Complainant does not carry out any activity for, nor has any business with the Respondent. Neither license nor authorization has been granted to the Respondent to make any use of the Complainant’s trademark “AMUNDI”, or to apply for registration of the disputed domain names.<\/p>", "other_legal_proceedings": "
The Panel is not aware of any other legal proceedings which are pending or decided and which relate to the disputed domain names.<\/p>", "no_response_filed": "
Complainant´s contentions are summarised above.<\/p>\n
NO ADMINISTRATIVELY COMPLIANT RESPONSE HAS BEEN FILED.<\/p>", "rights": "
The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain names are identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy).<\/p>", "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "
The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain names (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy).<\/p>", "bad_faith": "
The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain names have been registered and are being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy).<\/p>", "procedural_factors": "
The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.<\/p>", "decision": "Accepted", "panelists": [ "Dr. Thomas Schafft" ], "date_of_panel_decision": "2023-04-06 00:00:00", "informal_english_translation": "
The Complainant owns the international trademark registration n. 1024160 “AMUNDI” (word), registered on September 24, 2008, for various services in class 36.<\/p>\n
The Complainant also owns and uses various domain names incorporating the term “AMUNDI”, including the domain name <amundi-ee.com>, which was registered on September 24, 2009, and which Complainant uses for a website regarding company savings schemes (the letters “EE” stand for the French words “Epargne Entreprise”, which means “company savings schemes”).<\/p>\n
The disputed domain names were both registered on February 13, 2023, i.e., the Complainant’s trademark registration cited above predates the registration of the disputed domain names.<\/p>", "decision_domains": { "amumdi-ee.com": "TRANSFERRED", "amundi-eee.com": "TRANSFERRED" }, "panelist": null, "panellists_text": null }