{
    "case_number": "CAC-UDRP-105250",
    "time_of_filling": "2023-03-02 08:58:35",
    "domain_names": [
        "corelledinnerwareonline.com"
    ],
    "case_administrator": "  Iveta Špiclová   (Czech Arbitration Court) (Case admin)",
    "complainant": [
        "Instant Brands LLC"
    ],
    "complainant_representative": "Stobbs IP Ltd",
    "respondent": [
        "Ronh He"
    ],
    "respondent_representative": null,
    "factual_background": "<p>The CORELLE brand has extensive reach offering its products and services worldwide. The Complainant has an active online presence which is used for the main operating website at www.corelle.com, with the website being live since at least as early as 9 November 2000. The Complainant is also active on social media and has generated a significant level of endorsement.<\/p>\n<p>The Disputed Domain Name &lt;corelledinnerwareonline.com&gt; was registered on 14 April 2022. The Registrant is named \"Ronh He\" according to WHOIS information.&nbsp;<\/p>",
    "other_legal_proceedings": "<p>The Panel is not aware of any other legal proceedings which are pending or decided and which relate to the disputed domain name.<\/p>",
    "no_response_filed": "<p>The Complainant contends that the requirements of the Policy have been met and that the disputed domain name should be transferred to it.<\/p>\n<p>NO ADMINISTRATIVELY COMPLIANT RESPONSE HAS BEEN FILED.<\/p>",
    "rights": "<p>The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy).<\/p>",
    "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "<p>The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy).<\/p>",
    "bad_faith": "<p>The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy).<\/p>",
    "procedural_factors": "<p>The Complainant requests that the language of this administrative proceeding be English pursuant to UDRP Rule 11(a): Unless otherwise agreed by the Parties, or specified otherwise in the Registration Agreement, the language of the administrative proceeding shall be the language of the Registration Agreement, subject to the authority of the Panel to determine otherwise, having regard to the circumstances of the administrative proceeding. Complainant makes this request in light of the potential Chinese language Registration Agreement of the disputed domain name involved at this Complaint.<\/p>\n<p>Paragraph 10 of the UDRP Rules vests a Panel with authority to conduct the proceedings in a manner it considers appropriate while also ensuring both that the parties are treated with equality, and that each party is given a fair opportunity to present its case. UDRP panels have found that certain scenarios may warrant proceeding in a language other than that of the registration agreement. Such scenarios were summarized into WIPO Jurisprudential Overview 3.0, 4.5.1. In this particular instance, the Complainant requests change of languages of proceedings in light of Chinese language Registration Agreement by showing that 1) The disputed domain name redirects to website written entirely in English; 2) The dispute domain name contains generic English words such as &ldquo;dinnerware&rdquo; and &ldquo;online&rdquo;, suggesting that the Respondent has some grasp of the English language; and 3) the translation of the Complaint would unfairly disadvantage and burden the Complainant and delay the proceedings and adjudication of this matter.<\/p>\n<p>In light of the scenarios and equity, the Panel is of the view that conducting the proceeding in English is unlikely to heavily burden the Respondent, and it is likely that the Respondent can understand the English language based on a preponderance of evidence test. Without further objection from the Respondent on the issue, the Panel will proceed to issue the decision in English.<\/p>",
    "decision": "Accepted",
    "panelists": [
        "Carrie Shang"
    ],
    "date_of_panel_decision": "2023-04-09 00:00:00",
    "informal_english_translation": "<p>The Complainant is the registered proprietor of various trademarks of &ldquo;CORELLE&rdquo; and other intellectual property rights worldwide. Since launching the CORELLE brand in 1970, the Complainant has built a significant reputation and has built up a vast amount of goodwill in the CORELLE trademarks in the UK and abroad in relation to dinnerware goods and related services.<\/p>",
    "decision_domains": {
        "corelledinnerwareonline.com": "TRANSFERRED"
    },
    "panelist": null,
    "panellists_text": null
}