{
    "case_number": "CAC-UDRP-105318",
    "time_of_filling": "2023-03-29 09:03:19",
    "domain_names": [
        "new-perfectmoment.com"
    ],
    "case_administrator": "Olga Dvořáková (Case admin)",
    "complainant": [
        "PERFECT MOMENT (UK) LIMITED"
    ],
    "complainant_representative": "Convey srl",
    "respondent": [
        "Yu jia"
    ],
    "respondent_representative": null,
    "factual_background": "<p>The Complainant is the company <span>PERFECT MOMENT (UK) LIMITED and currently offers high performance lifestyle clothing with a focus on ski wear.&nbsp;<\/span><\/p>",
    "other_legal_proceedings": "<p>The Panel is not aware of any other legal proceedings which are pending or decided and which relate to the disputed domain name.<\/p>",
    "no_response_filed": "<p>COMPLAINANT:<\/p>\n<p><span>As regards the First element of the Policy, the Complainant claims that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to its prior trademarks \"PERFECT MOMENT\". According to the Complainant, the addition of the \"-\" and the generic term \"new\" do not exclude the finding of confusing similarity for the purposes of the Policy.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span>As regards the Second element of the Policy, the Complainant denies that the Respondent has rights or legitimate interests in registering the disputed domain name. According to the Complainant the disputed domain name is not used in connection with a bona fide offering of goods or services nor in a fair and non commercial manner as the disputed domain name is allegedly used to attract Internet users for commercial gain by creating a likelihood of confusion with the Complainant&rsquo;s Trademark.<br \/><\/span><\/p>\n<p>As regards the Third element of the Policy, the Complainant <span>supports that the disputed domain name is used in bad faith because the purpose of the registration was to attract Internet users for commercial gain by creating a likelihood of confusion with the Complainant&rsquo;s Trademark.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>RESPONDENT:<\/p>\n<p>The Respondent did not file a response.&nbsp;<\/p>",
    "rights": "<p>The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy).<\/p>",
    "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "<p>The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy).<\/p>",
    "bad_faith": "<p>The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy).<\/p>",
    "procedural_factors": "<p>The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.<\/p>",
    "decision": "Accepted",
    "panelists": [
        "Andrea Mascetti"
    ],
    "date_of_panel_decision": "2023-05-02 00:00:00",
    "informal_english_translation": "<p>The Complainant proved to be the owner of the following trademarks:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>European Union TM n. 0822326 &ndash; PERFECT MOMENT - 25,28;&nbsp;<\/li>\n<li>International TM n. 822326 &ndash; PERFECT MOMENT - 25,28;&nbsp;<\/li>\n<li>International TM n. 822326A &ndash; PERFECT MOMENT - 25,28;&nbsp;<\/li>\n<li>Swiss TM n. P-516624 - PERFECT MOMENT - Cl. 25, 28;&nbsp;<\/li>\n<li>Australian TM n. 1155248 - PERFECT MOMENT &ndash; Cl. 25, 28;&nbsp;<\/li>\n<li>UK TM n. UK00810822326 - PERFECT MOMENT &ndash; Cl. 25, 28;<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><\/p>",
    "decision_domains": {
        "new-perfectmoment.com": "TRANSFERRED"
    },
    "panelist": null,
    "panellists_text": null
}