{
    "case_number": "CAC-UDRP-105389",
    "time_of_filling": "2023-04-27 10:13:42",
    "domain_names": [
        "LNLESASANPAOLO.COM"
    ],
    "case_administrator": "  Iveta Špiclová   (Czech Arbitration Court) (Case admin)",
    "complainant": [
        "Intesa Sanpaolo S.p.A."
    ],
    "complainant_representative": "Intesa Sanpaolo S.p.A.",
    "respondent": [
        "adam senior"
    ],
    "respondent_representative": null,
    "factual_background": "<p>The Complainant, Intesa Sanpaolo S.p.A., is an Italian banking group founded in 2007 and with branches in a large number of countries worldwide. The Complainant has provided evidence of ownership of the following registrations for the marks \"INTESA\" and \"INTESA SANPAOLO\".<\/p>\n<p>The disputed domain name was registered on 18 December 2022 and resolves to a website blocked by Google Safebrowsing.<\/p>",
    "other_legal_proceedings": "<p>The Panel is not aware of any other legal proceedings which are pending or decided and which relate to the disputed domain name.<\/p>",
    "no_response_filed": "<p><strong>COMPLAINANT<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainant&rsquo;s trademark INTESA SANPAOLO and its domain names. The Complainant contends that the mark&rsquo;s verbal portion &ldquo;INT&rdquo; in the term &ldquo;INTESA&rdquo; is substituted with the letters &ldquo;LNL&rdquo; in the domain name, representing a clear example of typosquatting.<\/p>\n<p>Per the Complaint, the Respondent is not known by the disputed domain name. The Complainant contends that Respondent is not affiliated with nor authorized by the Complainant in any way and that Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name. The use of the domain name, in relation to a website blocked by Google Safebrowsing, cannot be considered as a bona fide offering of goods or services under the Policy, nor does the Respondent use the domain name for a legitimate or non-commercial fair use, per the Complainant.<\/p>\n<p>As regards the bad faith of the Respondent, the disputed domain name includes the distinctive trademark INTESA SANPAOLO. It is reasonable to infer that the Respondent has registered the domain name with full knowledge of the Complainant's trademark.<\/p>\n<p>Furthermore, the Complainant argues that the Respondent intentionally attempted to divert Internet users by creating a likelihood of confusion, and that the Respondent primarily intended to disrupt the Complainant&rsquo;s business by registering the disputed domain name. The Complainant further submits that the main purpose of the Respondent was to use the website for &ldquo;phishing&rdquo; financial information in an attempt to defraud the Complainant&rsquo;s customers. The Complainant finds no plausible legitimate use of the disputed domain name.<\/p>\n<p>Finally, the Complainant&rsquo;s Representative addressed a cease-and-desist letter to the Respondent, which remains unanswered.<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p><strong>RESPONDENT<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>NO ADMINISTRATIVELY COMPLIANT RESPONSE HAS BEEN FILED<\/p>",
    "rights": "<p>The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy).<\/p>",
    "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "<p>The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy).<\/p>",
    "bad_faith": "<p>The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy).<\/p>",
    "procedural_factors": "<p>The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.<\/p>",
    "decision": "Accepted",
    "panelists": [
        "Arthur Fouré"
    ],
    "date_of_panel_decision": "2023-06-08 00:00:00",
    "informal_english_translation": "<p>The Complainant has provided evidence of ownership of the following trademarks:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>International trademark registration n. 793367 &ldquo;INTESA&rdquo;, granted on September 04, 2002 and duly renewed, in class 36;<\/li>\n<li>International trademark registration n. 920896 &ldquo;INTESA SANPAOLO&rdquo;, granted on March 07, 2007 and duly renewed, in classes 9, 16, 35, 36, 41, 42;<\/li>\n<li>EU trademark registration n. 12247979 &ldquo;INTESA&rdquo;, applied on October 23, 2013 and granted on March 05, 2014, in classes 9, 16, 35, 36, 38, 41 and 42;<\/li>\n<li>EU trademark registration n. 5301999 &ldquo;INTESA SANPAOLO&rdquo;, applied on September 08, 2006, granted on June 18, 2007 and duly renewed, in classes 35, 36 and 38.<\/li>\n<\/ul>",
    "decision_domains": {
        "LNLESASANPAOLO.COM": "TRANSFERRED"
    },
    "panelist": null,
    "panellists_text": null
}