{
    "case_number": "CAC-UDRP-105408",
    "time_of_filling": "2023-05-02 11:38:03",
    "domain_names": [
        "boursorama.mom"
    ],
    "case_administrator": "Olga Dvořáková (Case admin)",
    "complainant": [
        "BOURSORAMA "
    ],
    "complainant_representative": "NAMESHIELD S.A.S.",
    "respondent": [
        "Wickams Cay (Tara International Enterprises Limited)"
    ],
    "respondent_representative": null,
    "factual_background": "<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The Complainant <span>grows in Europe with the emergence of e-commerce and the continuous expansion of the range of financial products online.<br \/><\/span><br \/><span>Pioneer and leader in its three core businesses, online brokerage, financial information on the Internet and online banking, <\/span>the Complainant<span> based its growth on innovation, commitment and transparency.<br \/><br \/>In France, <\/span>the Complainant<span> is the online banking reference with over 4,7 million customers. <\/span>According to the Complainant, t<span>he portal www.boursorama.com is the first national financial and economic information site and first French online banking platform.&nbsp;<br \/><br \/>The Complainant is the owner of several trademarks BOURSORAMA, such as the European trademark n<\/span>o.<span> 001758614<\/span>, <span>registered since <\/span>19.10.<span>2001.&nbsp;<br \/><br \/>The Complainant also owns a number of domain names, including the same distinctive wording BOURSORAMA, such as the domain names &lt;boursorama.com&gt;, registered since <\/span>01.03.<span>1998, and &lt;boursoramabanque.com&gt;, registered since <\/span>26.05.<span>2005.<br \/><br \/>The disputed domain name &lt;boursorama.mom&gt;<\/span> <span>was registered on <\/span><span>2<\/span>6.0<span>4<\/span>.202<span>3<\/span> <span>and resolves to a parking page<\/span>.<\/p>",
    "other_legal_proceedings": "<p>The Panel is not aware of any other legal proceedings which are pending or decided and which relate to the disputed domain name.<\/p>",
    "no_response_filed": "<p>NO ADMINISTRATIVELY COMPLIANT RESPONSE HAS BEEN FILED.<\/p>\n<p>COMPLAINANT'S CONTENTIONS:&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The Complainant states that the disputed domain name &lt;boursorama.<span>m<\/span>om&gt; is <span>identical<\/span> to its trademark BOURSORAMA<span>, as its <\/span>trademark is included in its entirety, without any addition or deletion.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><span>T<\/span>he Complainant contends that the addition of the suffix &ldquo;.<span>M<\/span>OM&rdquo; does not change the overall impression of the designation as being connected to the trademark BOURSORAMA. It does not prevent the likelihood of confusion between the disputed domain name and the Complainant, its trademark and its domain names associated.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><span>Further, the Complainant sustains that the <\/span>Respondent does not have any rights or legitimate interest in the <span>disputed <\/span>domain name<span>.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><span>In this sense, the<\/span> Complainant asserts that the Respondent is not identified in the Whois database as the disputed domain name<span> and that t<\/span>he Respondent is not known by the Complainant. The Complainant contends that Respondent is not affiliated with nor authorized by the Complainant in any way. The Complainant contends that Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name. <span>Further, t<\/span>he Complainant <span>sustains that it <\/span>does not carry out any activity for, nor has any business with the Respondent.<br \/><br \/>Neither license nor authorization has been granted to the Respondent to make any use of the Complainant&rsquo;s trademark BOURSORAMA, or apply for registration of the disputed domain name<span> as per the what the Complainant sustains<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Moreover, the disputed domain name resolves to a parking page. The Complainant contends that Respondent did not use the disputed domain name, and it confirms that Respondent has no demonstrable plan to use the disputed domain name.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><span>Further, the Complainant sustains that the contested <\/span>domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith<span>.<\/span><br \/><br \/><span>To this end, the Complainant contends that t<\/span>he disputed domain name is <span>identical<\/span> to the Complainant's well-known trademark BOURSORAMA.&nbsp;<br \/><br \/>Therefore, <span>in the Complainant&rsquo;s view, <\/span>the Respondent has registered the <span>disputed <\/span>domain name with full knowledge of the Complainant's trademark.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Besides, the Complainant <span>asserts<\/span> that <span>the <\/span>disputed domain name resolves to a parking page. The Complainant contends that the Respondent has not demonstrated any activity in respect of the disputed domain name, and it is not possible to conceive of any plausible actual or contemplated active use of the domain name by the Respondent that would not be illegitimate, such as by being a passing off, an infringement of consumer protection legislation, or an infringement of the Complainant&rsquo;s rights under trademark law.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\">On these bases, the Complainant asserts that the Respondent has registered and is using the disputed domain name in bad faith.<\/p>",
    "rights": "<p>The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy).<\/p>",
    "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "<p>The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy).<\/p>",
    "bad_faith": "<p>The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy).<\/p>",
    "procedural_factors": "<p>The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.<\/p>",
    "decision": "Accepted",
    "panelists": [
        "Delia-Mihaela Belciu"
    ],
    "date_of_panel_decision": "2023-06-09 00:00:00",
    "informal_english_translation": "<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The Complainant bases his Complaint on the European Union &ldquo;<span>BOURSORAMA<\/span>&rdquo;<span>, <\/span>no. 00<span>1758614<\/span>, filed on 13.07.2000, <span>registered <\/span>on 19.10.2001, for goods and services in classes 0<span>9, 16, 35, 36, 38, 41, 42<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><\/p>",
    "decision_domains": {
        "boursorama.mom": "TRANSFERRED"
    },
    "panelist": null,
    "panellists_text": null
}