{
    "case_number": "CAC-UDRP-105557",
    "time_of_filling": "2023-06-22 09:06:42",
    "domain_names": [
        "espace-clients-boursorma.com",
        "clients-login-boursorama-banque.com"
    ],
    "case_administrator": "  Iveta Špiclová   (Czech Arbitration Court) (Case admin)",
    "complainant": [
        "BOURSORAMA"
    ],
    "complainant_representative": "NAMESHIELD S.A.S.",
    "respondent": [
        "fg gfgs"
    ],
    "respondent_representative": null,
    "factual_background": "<p><span>FACTS ASSERTED BY THE COMPLAINANT AND NOT CONTESTED BY THE RESPONDENT:<\/span><\/p>\n<p>The Complainant informs that Boursorama is pioneer and leader in its three core businesses, (i) online brokerage, (ii) financial information on the Internet and (iii) online banking. In France, according to the Complainant, Boursorama is the leading online banking provider with over 4,9 million customers and the portal www.boursorama.com is the first national financial and economic information site and first French online banking platform.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><br \/><span>The Complainant notes that the disputed domain names were registered on June 17, 2003 and on June 18, 2023.<\/span><br \/><br \/><span>The Complainant assumes that the disputed domain names are confusingly similar to its registered trademark \"BOURSORAMA\" as the disputed domain names contains the Complainant's trademark in its entirety or with the mere omission of the letter \"A\". The addition of hyphens and of generic terms such as \"clients\", \"espace\", \"login\", \"banque\" does not alter the finding of similarity between the signs.<\/span><br \/><br \/><span>Furthermore, according with the Complainant's statement, the Respondent lacks rights or legitimate interest in the domain name in dispute since the Respondent is not affiliated with it nor authorized by it in any way and the Complainant does not carry out any activity for, nor has any business with, the Respondent. In addition, according to the Whois information connected to the domain names in disputes, the Respondent is not commonly known with the terms Boursorama, Boursorma, &lt;espace-clients-boursorama&gt; or &lt;clients-login-boursorama-banque&gt;.<\/span><br \/><br \/><span>The Complainant also contends that, given the distinctiveness of the Complainant's trademark and reputation, it is reasonable to infer that the Respondent has registered the domain names in dispute with the full knowledge of the Complainant's trademark. In addition, the websites in relation with the domain names in disputes resolve in one case in a login page copying the Complainant's official customer access and in the other case in a simple parking page.&nbsp; Therefore, according to the Complainant, the domain name are used in bad faith since in the first case the Respondent has intentionally attempted to attract, for commercial gain, internet users to his website, by creating a likelihood of confusion with the Complainant's mark as to the source, sponsorship, affiliation or endorsement of his website, while, in the other case, the incorporation of a famous mark into a domain name coupled with an inactive website is evidence of bad faith registration and use.<\/span><\/p>",
    "other_legal_proceedings": "<p>The Panel is not aware of any other legal proceedings which are pending or decided and which relate to the disputed domain names.<\/p>",
    "no_response_filed": "<p>NO ADMINISTRATIVELY COMPLIANT RESPONSE HAS BEEN FILED.&nbsp;<\/p>",
    "rights": "<p>The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain names are identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy).<\/p>",
    "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "<p>The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain names (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy).<\/p>",
    "bad_faith": "<p>The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain names have been registered and are being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy).<\/p>",
    "procedural_factors": "<p>The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.<\/p>",
    "decision": "Accepted",
    "panelists": [
        "Guido Maffei"
    ],
    "date_of_panel_decision": "2023-07-20 00:00:00",
    "informal_english_translation": "<p><span>The Complainant is the owner of a large portfolio of trademarks. In particular, BOURSORAMA SA owns the EU Registration No. 1758614 \"BOURSORAMA\" registered on October 19, 2001 (and duly renewed) for classes 9, 16, 35, 36, 38, 41 and 42.<\/span><\/p>",
    "decision_domains": {
        "espace-clients-boursorma.com": "TRANSFERRED",
        "clients-login-boursorama-banque.com": "TRANSFERRED"
    },
    "panelist": null,
    "panellists_text": null
}