{
    "case_number": "CAC-UDRP-105570",
    "time_of_filling": "2023-06-26 09:34:18",
    "domain_names": [
        "migrosancapital.com  "
    ],
    "case_administrator": "  Iveta Špiclová   (Czech Arbitration Court) (Case admin)",
    "complainant": [
        "Migros-Genossenschafts-Bund "
    ],
    "complainant_representative": "SILKA AB",
    "respondent": [
        "John  Robert"
    ],
    "respondent_representative": null,
    "factual_background": "<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><span>The Complainant, Migros-Genossenschafts-Bund, is the Swiss based umbrella organization of the regional Migros cooperatives. The Complainant<\/span> <span>includes (but is not limited to) retail companies, various trading and travel companies, several foundations as well as the Migros Bank.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><span>The disputed domain name &lt;migrosancapital.com&gt; has been registered on April 11, 2023. According to the Complainant&rsquo;s evidence, the disputed domain name resolved to a login page referring to Migros Bank. The disputed domain name currently resolves to an error page.<\/span><\/p>",
    "other_legal_proceedings": "<p>The Panel is not aware of any other legal proceedings which are pending or decided and which relate to the disputed domain name.<\/p>",
    "no_response_filed": "<p>NO ADMINISTRATIVELY COMPLIANT RESPONSE HAS BEEN FILED.&nbsp;<\/p>",
    "rights": "<p>The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy).<\/p>",
    "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "<p>The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy).<\/p>",
    "bad_faith": "<p>The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy).<\/p>",
    "procedural_factors": "<p>The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.<\/p>",
    "decision": "Accepted",
    "panelists": [
        "Flip Petillion"
    ],
    "date_of_panel_decision": "2023-07-20 00:00:00",
    "informal_english_translation": "<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The Complainant is the holder of various trademarks including the following:<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\">- MIGROS, Swiss word mark registration No. 2P-415060, registered on <span>February 13<\/span>, 1995 in classes 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41 and 42;<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\">- MIGROS, <span>Unites States<\/span> word mark registration No. 6026436, registered on <span>April 7, 2020<\/span> in class 35<span>;<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><span>- MIGROSBANK, Swiss word mark registration No. 2P-414500, registered on January 12, 1995 in class 36.<\/span><\/p>",
    "decision_domains": {
        "migrosancapital.com  ": "TRANSFERRED"
    },
    "panelist": null,
    "panellists_text": null
}