{
    "case_number": "CAC-UDRP-105530",
    "time_of_filling": "2023-06-15 09:31:31",
    "domain_names": [
        "connexion-clients-boursorama-banque.com"
    ],
    "case_administrator": "  Iveta Špiclová   (Czech Arbitration Court) (Case admin)",
    "complainant": [
        "BOURSORAMA"
    ],
    "complainant_representative": "NAMESHIELD S.A.S.",
    "respondent": [
        "fg gfgs"
    ],
    "respondent_representative": null,
    "factual_background": "<p>The Complainant, a French company, is active in online banking, financial information and online brokerage, with more than 4 million customers.<span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">&nbsp;<\/span><\/p>\n<p>The disputed domain name was registered on June 9, 2023 and resolved to a login page being highly similar to Complainant&acute;s official customer access page which might be used in order to collect personal information of the Complainant&acute;s clients.<\/p>",
    "other_legal_proceedings": "<p>The Panel is not aware of any other legal proceedings which are pending or decided and which relate to the disputed domain name.<\/p>",
    "no_response_filed": "<p>NO ADMINISTRATIVELY COMPLIANT RESPONSE HAS BEEN FILED.&nbsp;<\/p>",
    "rights": "<p>The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy).<\/p>",
    "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "<p>The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy).<\/p>",
    "bad_faith": "<p>The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy).<\/p>",
    "procedural_factors": "<p>The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.<\/p>",
    "decision": "Accepted",
    "panelists": [
        "Dietrich Beier"
    ],
    "date_of_panel_decision": "2023-07-24 00:00:00",
    "informal_english_translation": "<p>The Complainant is, inter alia, proprietor of the valid Union trademark 001758614 for BOURSORAMA registered on October 19, 2001 in several classes.<\/p>",
    "decision_domains": {
        "connexion-clients-boursorama-banque.com": "TRANSFERRED"
    },
    "panelist": null,
    "panellists_text": null
}