{ "case_number": "CAC-UDRP-105585", "time_of_filling": "2023-06-29 08:56:53", "domain_names": [ "wwwseloger.com" ], "case_administrator": "Olga Dvořáková (Case admin)", "complainant": [ "DIGITAL CLASSIFIEDS FRANCE SAS" ], "complainant_representative": "NAMESHIELD S.A.S.", "respondent": [ " lahcen miftah" ], "respondent_representative": null, "factual_background": "

GROUPE SELOGER is the Complainant in the current proceedings, which is a group specializing in the distribution of real estate advertisements on the internet and in specialized press. The Complainant employs a vast number of real estate professionals and provides information on its services online, inter alia under the domain name <seloger.com>, registered since October 18, 1996.<\/span><\/p>\n

The disputed domain name <wwwseloger.com> was registered on June 25, 2023 and resolves to an inactive (error) page. Besides, the disputed domain name is offered for sale for an undetermined price on the platform \"Sedo\".<\/p>", "other_legal_proceedings": "

The Panel is not aware of any other legal proceedings which are pending or decided and which relate to the disputed domain name.<\/p>", "no_response_filed": "

COMPLAINANT:<\/p>\n

The Complainant contends that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Trademark.<\/span>

Furthermore, the Complainant contends that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain name. In this regard, the Complainant states that the Respondent is not commonly known by the disputed domain name, that it is not affiliated with nor authorized by the Complainant in any way, that the Complainant does not carry out any activity for, nor has any business with the Respondent, and that neither license nor authorization has been granted to the Respondent to make any use of the Trademark or apply for registration of the disputed domain name by the Complainant.<\/span>

Finally, the Complainant contends that the disputed domain name was registered and is being used in bad faith. It contends that the Respondent must have been fully aware of the Complainant and its well-known Trademark at the time of registration of the disputed domain name, that the Respondent's passive holding of the disputed domain name and the attempt to sell it is evidence of bad faith.<\/span>

RESPONDENT:<\/span>
No administratively compliant Response has been filed.<\/span><\/p>", "rights": "

The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy).<\/p>", "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "

The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy).<\/p>", "bad_faith": "

The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy).<\/p>", "procedural_factors": "

The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.<\/p>", "decision": "Accepted", "panelists": [ "Stefanie Efstathiou LL.M. mult." ], "date_of_panel_decision": "2023-08-07 00:00:00", "informal_english_translation": "

The Complainant is the owner of several trademarks for the term “SELOGER” such as:<\/p>\n