{
    "case_number": "CAC-UDRP-105630",
    "time_of_filling": "2023-07-17 11:32:15",
    "domain_names": [
        "frnuxe.com"
    ],
    "case_administrator": "Olga Dvořáková (Case admin)",
    "complainant": [
        "LABORATOIRE NUXE"
    ],
    "complainant_representative": "Clémence Touillier (ATOUT PI LAPLACE)",
    "respondent": [
        "Jessica  van Mierlo"
    ],
    "respondent_representative": null,
    "factual_background": "<p>The Complainant is a French company that manufactures and trades cosmetics, personal care products and related services around the world under trademark NUXE.<\/p>\n<p>The Complainant owns EU and International trademarks for NUXE, and rights in the Nuxe company name and trade name. It also holds numerous domain names incorporating NUXE, such as &lt;nuxe.com&gt;, &lt;nuxe.fr&gt;, &lt;nuxe.eu&gt;, &lt;nuxe.ca&gt;, &lt;nuxe.us&gt;, &lt;nuxe.bio&gt;, &lt;nuxe.pro&gt;, and &lt;nuxe.cn&gt;.<\/p>\n<p>The disputed domain name was registered on 1 May 2023 using a privacy service. The disputed domain name resolves to the Complainant&rsquo;s website, https:\/\/fr.nuxe.com.<\/p>",
    "other_legal_proceedings": "<p>The Panel is not aware of any other legal proceedings which are pending or decided and which relate to the disputed domain name.<\/p>",
    "no_response_filed": "<p>COMPLAINANT:<\/p>\n<p>The Complainant asserts that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to its trademark NUXE. Adding the letters &ldquo;fr&rdquo; before NUXE emphasises the link with the Complainant, which is a French company.<\/p>\n<p>The Complainant also asserts that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain name and states:<\/p>\n<ol style=\"list-style-type: lower-roman;\">\n<li>the Complainant is the sole owner of the NUXE marks all around the world and has not authorised the Respondent to use it or apply for registration of the disputed domain name. The juxtaposition of the country code &ldquo;fr&rdquo; (for France) and the trademark NUXE has not been authorised; and<\/li>\n<li>the Respondent registered and used the disputed domain name intending to breach the Complainant&rsquo;s rights and to mislead the consumers by impersonating the Complainant by redirecting consumers to the Complainant&rsquo;s legitimate website, and by phishing or spamming activities via the creation of messaging servers with IP addresses.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>The Complainant asserts that the Respondent registered and used the disputed domain name in bad faith and states:<\/p>\n<ol style=\"list-style-type: lower-roman;\">\n<li>the disputed domain name wholly reproduces the Complainant&rsquo;s trademark, NUXE and adds the letters &ldquo;fr&rdquo; (for France) before NUXE to pretend a link with the Complainant, a French company;<\/li>\n<li>in France, the first results of a Google search for NUXE refers to Complainant&rsquo;s website, https:\/\/fr.nuxe.com. The Respondent must have known of the Complainant&rsquo;s trademarks and activities when registering and using the disputed domain name and registered it in bad faith;<\/li>\n<li>the disputed domain name redirects to the Complainant&rsquo;s legitimate website, https:\/\/fr.nuxe.com, which demonstrates the Respondent&rsquo;s intention to mislead the Complainant&rsquo;s clients by pretending to be the Complainant; and<\/li>\n<li>the registration was made to in bad faith to create messaging servers with IP addresses for phishing, commercial emailing or spamming activities. See <em>Robertet SA v. Marie Claude Holler, WIPO Case No. D2018-1878, <\/em>and<em> Credit Industriel et Commercial S.A. v. Xing Zhou, WIPO Case No. D2019-0654<\/em><em>.<\/em><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>RESPONDENT:<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;No administratively compliant Response has been filed<\/p>",
    "rights": "<p>The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy).<\/p>",
    "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "<p>The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy).<\/p>",
    "bad_faith": "<p>The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy).<\/p>",
    "procedural_factors": "<p>The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.<\/p>",
    "decision": "Accepted",
    "panelists": [
        "Veronica  Bailey"
    ],
    "date_of_panel_decision": "2023-08-22 00:00:00",
    "informal_english_translation": "<p>The Complainant owns several word trademarks for NUXE including:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>European Union trademark registration number 8774531, registered on 15 June 2010 in classes 3 and 44; and<\/li>\n<li>International trademark registration number 1072247, registered 14 February 2011 in classes 3 and 44.<\/li>\n<\/ul>",
    "decision_domains": {
        "frnuxe.com": "TRANSFERRED"
    },
    "panelist": null,
    "panellists_text": null
}