{
    "case_number": "CAC-UDRP-105641",
    "time_of_filling": "2023-08-08 13:29:16",
    "domain_names": [
        "siemens-heathineers.com"
    ],
    "case_administrator": "Olga Dvořáková (Case admin)",
    "complainant": [
        "Siemens Trademark GmbH & Co. KG"
    ],
    "complainant_representative": null,
    "respondent": [
        "Chad Moston (Elite Media Group)"
    ],
    "respondent_representative": null,
    "factual_background": "<p>According to the information provided by the registrar the disputed domain name &lt;siemens-heathineers.com&gt; was registered on 31 January 2021.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;According to the information provided by Complainant the disputed domain name resolves to a pay-per-click parking website.&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/p>",
    "other_legal_proceedings": "<p>The Panel is not aware of any other legal proceedings which are pending or decided and which relate to the disputed domain name.<\/p>",
    "no_response_filed": "<p>COMPLAINANT:<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;Complainant is part of the Siemens Group. Siemens Healthineers has a 120-year track record in developing, manufacturing and selling a diverse range of imaging, diagnostics and advanced therapies products and services to healthcare providers in more than 180 countries. Siemens Healthineers is one of the largest manufacturers of medical equipment worldwide, with approximately 54.000 employees.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;Complainant submits that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to Complainant's trademark. According to Complainant this is a clear case of typosquatting, as the disputed domain name contains an obvious misspelling of Complainant&rsquo;s trademark, as only the letter &ldquo;l&rdquo; in the Healthineers part of the trademark is deleted in the disputed domain name.&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;According to Complainant, Respondent has no rights or legitimate interest in the disputed domain name. Respondent is not and has never been one of the Complainant&rsquo;s representatives, employees or one of its licensees, nor is otherwise authorized to use the trademark SIEMENS-HEALTHINEERS. Complainant does not have any connection with Respondent. No such relation has ever been established between Respondent and Complainant. The disputed domain name resolves to a pay-per-click parking page. Therefore, Respondent is not using the domain name in connection with a bona fide offering of goods or services. Respondent has not been commonly known with this disputed domain name.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;According to Complainant the disputed domain name is registered and is being used in bad faith. The disputed domain name was registered in bad faith, as Respondent clearly knew about the Complainant&rsquo;s earlier rights in the trademarks SIEMENS-HEALTHINEERS with the intention of taking predatory advantage of the goodwill of the Siemens Group, in order to divert Internet traffic, intended for the legitimate website of Siemens Healthineers, to Respondent's potential website. Complainant assert that this is a clear-cut typosquatting case, where the Respondent has &ldquo;parked&rdquo; this domain within the Registrar aiming to, either lure Complainant into offering to buy the domain from Respondent, in an attempt to extract monetary gain from such transaction, and\/or use the disputed domain name at a later time, in order to purposefully create confusion with the offerings of the Siemens Group among the concerned consumers, and extract gain from fraudulent activity.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;RESPONDENT:<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;No administratively compliant Response has been filed.<\/p>",
    "rights": "<p>Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which&nbsp; Complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy).<\/p>",
    "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "<p>Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy).<\/p>",
    "bad_faith": "<p>Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy).<\/p>",
    "procedural_factors": "<p>The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.<\/p>",
    "decision": "Accepted",
    "panelists": [
        "Dinant T.L. Oosterbaan"
    ],
    "date_of_panel_decision": "2023-09-05 00:00:00",
    "informal_english_translation": "<p>According to the evidence submitted by Complainant, Complainant is the owner of International Trademark nr. 1357232 SIEMENS-HEALTHINEERS with registration date 25 October 2016.<\/p>",
    "decision_domains": {
        "siemens-heathineers.com": "TRANSFERRED"
    },
    "panelist": null,
    "panellists_text": null
}