{ "case_number": "CAC-UDRP-105675", "time_of_filling": "2023-08-01 09:42:54", "domain_names": [ "amundi-apps.com", "amundi-globals.com", "amundi-vip.com", "amundi-vips.com" ], "case_administrator": "Olga Dvořáková (Case admin)", "complainant": [ "AMUNDI ASSET MANAGEMENT" ], "complainant_representative": "NAMESHIELD S.A.S.", "respondent": [ "yyy lang" ], "respondent_representative": null, "factual_background": "
As the Respondent did not file any response to the complaint, the Panel took into account the following facts asserted by the Complainant (and supported by the documentary evidence submitted by the Complainant) and unchallenged by the Respondent:

(a) The Complainant is Europe's number one asset manager by assets under management and has offices in Europe, Asia-Pacific, the Middle-East and the Americas. With over 100 million retail, institutional and corporate clients, the Complainant ranks in the top 10 globally.<\/span>

(b) The Complainant owns the Complainant's Trademark.

(c) The Complainant also owns the domain name <amundi.com>, registered on 26 August 2004, used for its official website. The Complainant also owns other domain names comprising the distinctive wording AMUNDI® and terms related to its activities, such as <amundi-funds.com>, registered on 16 September 2009.

(d) The disputed domain names were registered on 26 July 2023 and resolve to a parking page. <\/div>", "other_legal_proceedings": "

The Panel is not aware of any other legal proceedings which are pending or decided and which relate to the disputed domain names.<\/p>", "no_response_filed": "

THE COMPLAINANT:<\/span>

In addition to the above factual assertions, the Complainant also contends the following:<\/span>

(i) The disputed domain names are confusingly similar to Complainant’s Trademark. They contain Complainant’s Trademark followed by a generic terms \"globals\", \"apps\", \"vips\" or \"vip\". Adding such non-distinctive terms does not diminish confusing similarity of the disputed domain names to Complainant's Trademark.<\/span>

(ii) The Respondent is not affiliated with the Complainant nor authorized by it in any way to use Complainant’s Trademark. The Complainant does not carry out any activity for, nor has any business with the Respondent. Neither license nor authorization has been granted by the Complainant to the Respondent to make any use of the Complainant’s Trademark or apply for registration of the disputed domain names. The Respondent did not make any use of disputed domain names, and it confirms that Respondent has no demonstrable plan to use the disputed domain names. Therefore, the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interest in respect of the disputed domain names.<\/span>

(iii) Given the distinctiveness of the Complainant's Trademark and its reputation, it is reasonable to infer that the Respondent has registered the disputed domain names with full knowledge of the Complainant's Trademark. The Respondent has not demonstrated any activity in respect of the disputed domain names, and it is not possible to conceive of any plausible actual or contemplated active use of such domain names by the Respondent that would not be illegitimate, such as by being a passing off, an infringement of consumer protection legislation, or an infringement of the Complainant’s rights under trademark law. This amounts to bad faith in registration and use of the disputed domain names.<\/span>

For the above reasons, the Complainant seeks transfer of the disputed domain names to the Complainant.<\/span>

THE RESPONDENT:<\/span>

The Respondent did not provide any response to the complaint.<\/span><\/p>", "rights": "

The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain names are identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy <\/span>(\"UDRP\" or \"Policy\")<\/span>).<\/p>\n

For details, please see \"Principal Reasons for the Decision\".<\/span><\/p>\n

<\/p>", "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "

The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain names (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy).<\/p>\n

For details, please see \"Principal Reasons for the Decision\".<\/span><\/p>", "bad_faith": "

The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain names have been registered and are being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy).<\/p>\n

For details, please see \"Principal Reasons for the Decision\".<\/span><\/p>", "procedural_factors": "

The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.<\/p>", "decision": "Accepted", "panelists": [ "Michal Matějka" ], "date_of_panel_decision": "2023-09-02 00:00:00", "informal_english_translation": "

The Complainant is the owner of international trademark no. 1024160 AMUNDI® registered on 24 September 2009, in class 36.<\/span><\/p>\n

(\"Complainant's Trademark\").<\/span><\/p>\n

The disputed domain names were registered on 26 July 2023.<\/span><\/p>", "decision_domains": { "amundi-apps.com": "TRANSFERRED", "amundi-globals.com": "TRANSFERRED", "amundi-vip.com": "TRANSFERRED", "amundi-vips.com": "TRANSFERRED" }, "panelist": null, "panellists_text": null }