{
    "case_number": "CAC-UDRP-105679",
    "time_of_filling": "2023-08-02 10:26:47",
    "domain_names": [
        "myselogerpro.cloud"
    ],
    "case_administrator": "Olga Dvořáková (Case admin)",
    "complainant": [
        "DIGITAL CLASSIFIEDS FRANCE"
    ],
    "complainant_representative": "NAMESHIELD S.A.S.",
    "respondent": [
        "Cralos  Ramirez Fuentes"
    ],
    "respondent_representative": null,
    "factual_background": "<p>The Complainant is a group specializing in the distribution of real estate advertisements on the internet and in the specialized press. The Complainant employs over 20,000 real estate professionals and has over 60 million visits on the Internet.<br \/>Furthermore, the Complainant offers a dedicated website\/application to real estate professionals called \"MySelogerpro\".<\/p>\n<p>The disputed domain name was registered on July 27, 2023, and resolves to a blank page.<\/p>",
    "other_legal_proceedings": "<p>The Panel is not aware of any other legal proceedings which are pending or decided and which relate to the disputed domain name.<\/p>",
    "no_response_filed": "<p>COMPLAINANT:<\/p>\n<p><br \/>The disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainant's trademarks;<\/p>\n<p><br \/>The Complainant contends that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the SELOGER and SELOGER PRO trademarks. The Complainant further affirms that the disputed domain name exactly reproduces the &ldquo;SELOGER PRO&rdquo; trademark with the mere addition of the term &ldquo;my&rdquo;, and that this combination strengthens confusion by suggesting to consumers that the disputed domain name and corresponding web site might be operated by the Complainant or with the Complainant&rsquo;s authorization.<\/p>\n<p><br \/>The Respondent does not have any rights or legitimate interest in the disputed domain name:<\/p>\n<p>The Complainant contends that the Respondent is not commonly known by the disputed domain name and that the Respondent is not affiliated with or authorized by the Complainant in any way. The Complainant does not carry out any activity for, nor has any business dealings with, the Respondent. The Complainant further contends that the disputed domain name redirects to a blank page, and that this is not a bona fide use. On the contrary, it proves a lack of legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name except in order to create a likelihood of confusion with the Complainant and its trademarks.<\/p>\n<p><br \/>The disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith:<\/p>\n<p>The Complainant contends that owing to the renown of the Complainant&rsquo;s trademarks, it is presumable that the Respondent had actual knowledge of the Complainant&rsquo;s distinctive trademarks.<\/p>\n<p>The Complainant further contends that it is inconceivable that at the time of registration of the disputed domain name the Respondent did not know of the Complainant&rsquo;s trademark and activity. Rather, the combination of the SELOGER PRO distinctive trademark, together with the generic term \"my&rdquo;, strengthens the confusion between the disputed domain name and the Complainant&rsquo;s trademark, and the inference that the Respondent was aware of the Complainant&rsquo;s trademark.<br \/>The Complainant also claims that the Respondent is using the disputed domain name with the sole purpose of impersonating the Complainant for fraudulent purposes.<br \/>RESPONDENT:<\/p>\n<p>NO ADMINISTRATIVELY COMPLIANT RESPONSE HAS BEEN FILED.<\/p>",
    "rights": "<p>The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy).<\/p>",
    "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "<p>The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy).<\/p>",
    "bad_faith": "<p>The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy).<\/p>",
    "procedural_factors": "<p>The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.<\/p>",
    "decision": "Accepted",
    "panelists": [
        "Fabrizio Bedarida"
    ],
    "date_of_panel_decision": "2023-09-05 00:00:00",
    "informal_english_translation": "<p>The Complainant is the owner of the renowned SELOGER trademark registered in numerous countries. The Complainant owns <em>inter alia<\/em> the following registrations:<\/p>\n<p>French trademark SELOGER no. 1751230 registered on April 13, 1988;<br \/>French trademark SE LOGER PRO no. 3120500 registered on September 11, 2001;<br \/>French trademark SELOGER (device) no. 3436367 registered on June 22, 2006;<br \/>French trademark SELOGER (device) no. 4319185 registered on December 2, 2016.<\/p>\n<p>The Complainant also owns the domain names &lt;seloger.com&gt;, registered on October 18, 1996 and used for its official website, and &lt;selogerpro.com&gt;, registered on May 29, 2000.<\/p>",
    "decision_domains": {
        "myselogerpro.cloud": "TRANSFERRED"
    },
    "panelist": null,
    "panellists_text": null
}