{
    "case_number": "CAC-UDRP-105678",
    "time_of_filling": "2023-08-02 14:34:34",
    "domain_names": [
        "ClearStream.cc",
        "Clearstreambankingpayment.com"
    ],
    "case_administrator": "  Iveta Špiclová   (Czech Arbitration Court) (Case admin)",
    "complainant": [
        "Clearstream Services, société anonyme\t"
    ],
    "complainant_representative": "Mark Peters LL.M. (Grünecker Patent und Rechtsanwälte PartG mbB)",
    "respondent": [
        "Flavia  Ferraro",
        "ibrahim matapit (cdbpayment)"
    ],
    "respondent_representative": null,
    "factual_background": "<p>Clearstream is a financial services company that provides post-trade services to financial institutions, including banks, broker-dealers, and investment firms. It is a subsidiary of Deutsche B&ouml;rse Group, one of the world's largest stock exchange operators. Clearstream specializes in clearing, settlement, custody, and asset servicing services for a wide range of financial instruments, including stocks, bonds, securities, and derivatives. Its primary goal is to facilitate the efficient and secure transfer of securities and cash between parties in financial transactions.<\/p>\n<p><\/p>",
    "other_legal_proceedings": "<p>The Panel is not aware of any other legal proceedings which are pending or decided and which relate to the disputed domain names.<\/p>",
    "no_response_filed": "<p>The Complainant contends that the requirements of the Policy have been met and that the disputed domain names should be transferred to it.<\/p>\n<p>NO ADMINISTRATIVELY COMPLIANT RESPONSE HAS BEEN FILED.<\/p>",
    "rights": "<p>The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain names are identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy).<\/p>",
    "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "<p>The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondents to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain names (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy).<\/p>",
    "bad_faith": "<p>The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain names have been registered and are being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy).<\/p>",
    "procedural_factors": "<p>The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.<\/p>",
    "decision": "Accepted",
    "panelists": [
        "Mr. Etienne Wéry"
    ],
    "date_of_panel_decision": "2023-09-14 00:00:00",
    "informal_english_translation": "<p>Various trademarks, including \"CLEARSTREAM\" (EUIPO, n&deg; 001403476, 29-11-1999 for classes 9, 36, 42).<\/p>",
    "decision_domains": {
        "ClearStream.cc": "TRANSFERRED",
        "Clearstreambankingpayment.com": "TRANSFERRED"
    },
    "panelist": null,
    "panellists_text": null
}